| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 05:44:26 -0400, Arnie Macy wrote:
That could very well have been. Normally, it runs very close to the 56k and downloads are fairly quick (for a dial-up), but there are days I notice a definite decrease in speed. Overall, though. I prefer paying the 9 bucks a month for dial-up opposed to the 40 plus bucks for cable. You forgot to add in the cost of a second phone line for the dial-up (I keep my LAN on line 24/7), which used to be $26 per month. That put the cable only ten bucks ahead of the dial-up and the extra speed sure was worth that. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Additional Line Losses Due to SWR | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 | General | |||
| Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna | |||
| There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General | |||