Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Mike Coslo wrote: JJ wrote: Larry Roll K3LT wrote: Yup -- got it right that time. CW *is* an operator skill. Yes it is. Do you have something against operator skill -- or are you one of those New Age hams that think yakking into a microphone is all the demonstration of operator skill that should ever be required of you? Do you have something against someone who has no desire to operate CW? There are many different modes of operation in ham radio, do you operate them all? No more than I have against someone who chooses to do satellite work, while I have to test for it. What if you decide at some later time to do satellite work? Rf Safety is required to be calculated for by people when they run over a certain power. Why should someone who never intends to work over 50 watts have to test for RF safety? What if they decide at some later point to increase their power? If someone never intends to homebrew, why should they test on any equations. What is they suddenly get the urge to build a homebrew transmitter or amplifier? Sounds like we should maybe make up our own tests. Maybe you had rather be call in to be tested on a new mode each time you decide to operate a new mode. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() JJ wrote: Mike Coslo wrote: Larry Roll K3LT wrote: Yup -- got it right that time. CW *is* an operator skill. Do you have something against operator skill -- or are you one of those New Age hams that think yakking into a microphone is all the demonstration of operator skill that should ever be required of you? Do you have something against someone who has no desire to operate CW? There are many different modes of operation in ham radio, do you operate them all? No more than I have against someone who chooses to do satellite work, while I have to test for it. What if you decide at some later time to do satellite work? Correct! Rf Safety is required to be calculated for by people when they run over a certain power. Why should someone who never intends to work over 50 watts have to test for RF safety? What if they decide at some later point to increase their power? Correct! If someone never intends to homebrew, why should they test on any equations. What is they suddenly get the urge to build a homebrew transmitter or amplifier? Correct! Sounds like we should maybe make up our own tests. Maybe you had rather be call in to be tested on a new mode each time you decide to operate a new mode. Correct! You do know I'm being a devil's advocate here? Or better said, I really believe that an prospective amateur should get as much education as possible. Removing the Morse code requirement, while celebrated by some hams and prospective hams, is not a good thing. They who celebrate this are celebrating advancement of ignorance. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|