Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , Dwight Stewart writes: Instead, both seem to be saying code is no longer a necessary radio skill since so few radio operators outside ham radio use it today. That's another argument entirely. Of course hams DO use Morse code quite a lot. It's a mystery why what is done in other radio services should count more than what hams do, when it comes to figuring out the requirements for an amateur license. This position relates to the basis and purpose of Amateur Radio (97.1a, 97.1c, and 97.1d). Opinions vary. Actually the fact that other services don't use it very much is a strong argument to require hams to learn it. This is the place to preserve the skill in case of need and to prevent this capability from becoming a lost art. Plus of course the fact that quite a few hams do use it. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
y.com... "N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , Dwight Stewart writes: Instead, both seem to be saying code is no longer a necessary radio skill since so few radio operators outside ham radio use it today. That's another argument entirely. Of course hams DO use Morse code quite a lot. It's a mystery why what is done in other radio services should count more than what hams do, when it comes to figuring out the requirements for an amateur license. This position relates to the basis and purpose of Amateur Radio (97.1a, 97.1c, and 97.1d). Opinions vary. Actually the fact that other services don't use it very much is a strong argument to require hams to learn it. This is the place to preserve the skill in case of need and to prevent this capability from becoming a lost art. Plus of course the fact that quite a few hams do use it. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Well, why does it have to be a requirement that hams learn it? An analogy to your thought above could be: Doctors should have to be required to know how to use Shaman medicine in case of need and to prevent this capability from becoming a lost art. (The analogy works if one believes that alternative medicine works--and I do). But, you see what I mean, right? There are groups, societies if you will, that take up and preserve the CW mode. FISTS comes to mind. There are great guys/gals, long-licensed amateurs, who love to share the skill with others and who will teach it at only the slightest provocation. There are EmCom "chiefs" who recognize the capability of increased communication benefits when using CW. The list goes on. Get rid of CW testing. If the mode is all that it is said to be, it will stand on its own. If it doesn't stand on its own, then adapt and adjust. Kim W5TIT |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Kim W5TIT" wrote:
(snip) Kim, I don't know what is going on with your newsgroup messages. Many of your messages are listed as no longer on my server very shortly after you post them (sometimes just one or two hours later). The messages are listed in my message list of this newsgroup, but I get an error ("message no longer on server") when I try to read them. For everyone else, I can read messages they posted many days ago. Anyway, just wanted to let you know what is happening in case you post a reply to one of my messages and don't get a response. It's not that I'm trying to ignore you - I just can't read or reply to your quickly disappearing messages (I caught and replied to this one before it disappeared) Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message ... "Kim W5TIT" wrote: (snip) Kim, I don't know what is going on with your newsgroup messages. Many of your messages are listed as no longer on my server very shortly after you post them (sometimes just one or two hours later). The messages are listed in my message list of this newsgroup, but I get an error ("message no longer on server") when I try to read them. For everyone else, I can read messages they posted many days ago. Anyway, just wanted to let you know what is happening in case you post a reply to one of my messages and don't get a response. It's not that I'm trying to ignore you - I just can't read or reply to your quickly disappearing messages (I caught and replied to this one before it disappeared) Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ I had my witches coven put a curse on her. Dan/W4NTI |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" wrote Kim, I don't know what is going on with your newsgroup messages. (snip) I had my witches coven put a curse on her. Something has sure happened. After I posted that message, I ran into three or four other messages posted by Kim that resulted in the same error message (all posted after the message I replied to). Very odd. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Dwight Stewart
writes: "Dan/W4NTI" wrote: "Dwight Stewart" wrote Kim, I don't know what is going on with your newsgroup messages. (snip) I had my witches coven put a curse on her. Something has sure happened. After I posted that message, I ran into three or four other messages posted by Kim that resulted in the same error message (all posted after the message I replied to). Very odd. Dwight, you need to upgrade your computer's AntiCurse software. :-) I got mine through the Hogwart's on-line store. University rates, too! LHA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Len Over 21" wrote:
Dwight Stewart writes: "Dan/W4NTI" wrote: "Dwight Stewart" wrote Kim, I don't know what is going on with your newsgroup messages. (snip) I had my witches coven put a curse on her. Something has sure happened. After I posted that message, I ran into three or four other messages posted by Kim that resulted in the same error message (all posted after the message I replied to). Very odd. Dwight, you need to upgrade your computer's AntiCurse software. :-) I got mine through the Hogwart's on-line store. University rates, too! I've tried the swish and flick method several times. It didn't help with Kim's messages (my computer's mouse is a little charred though). Perhaps I'm pronouncing the words wrong. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
... "Kim W5TIT" wrote: (snip) Kim, I don't know what is going on with your newsgroup messages. Many of your messages are listed as no longer on my server very shortly after you post them (sometimes just one or two hours later). The messages are listed in my message list of this newsgroup, but I get an error ("message no longer on server") when I try to read them. For everyone else, I can read messages they posted many days ago. Anyway, just wanted to let you know what is happening in case you post a reply to one of my messages and don't get a response. It's not that I'm trying to ignore you - I just can't read or reply to your quickly disappearing messages (I caught and replied to this one before it disappeared) Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ Wow, thanks for letting me know, Dwight!!! Larry must be in withdrawal...I'll switch over to the other one! Kim W5TIT --- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net Complaints to |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
... "Kim W5TIT" wrote: (snip) Kim, I don't know what is going on with your newsgroup messages. Many of your messages are listed as no longer on my server very shortly after you post them (sometimes just one or two hours later). The messages are listed in my message list of this newsgroup, but I get an error ("message no longer on server") when I try to read them. For everyone else, I can read messages they posted many days ago. Anyway, just wanted to let you know what is happening in case you post a reply to one of my messages and don't get a response. It's not that I'm trying to ignore you - I just can't read or reply to your quickly disappearing messages (I caught and replied to this one before it disappeared) Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ There, how's that? Kim W5TIT |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Kim W5TIT" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" wrote Kim, I don't know what is going on with your newsgroup messages. (snip) There, how's that? Well, I was able to read it. However, it has only been a little over an hour since you posted it. I'm going to mark the message as unread and try it again tomorrow to see if it is still on the server. I'll let you know what happens. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |