Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Arnie Macy" wrote in message ...
"Brian" wrote ... Arnie, go ahead and let her take your answer. No sense in both of you being wrong. __________________________________________________ ___________________ Not so fast there, Brian. NCI has been on the record as saying that the tests should be made less technical. Not a far leap at all to presume they will try and "dumb" them down even more. Arnie - KT4ST Arnie, citation please. It is the disgruntled PCTA that have advocated a "No Test International" concept. I do not speak for NCI, but am on record for saying that the entry level exam is far to technical for an entry level license, and the entry level priveleges of 1,500 watts of UHF radiation are far too great for an entry level safety. Of course, the Technician license was never meant to be an entry license, being the consolation prize for General-level knowledge w/o the outdated, superfluous and irrelevant psycho-motor skills to twiddle a paddle at 13wpm. Brian |