| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Phil Kane" wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 13:21:41 GMT, wrote: Isn't forbidding me to operate a transmitter the same as forbidding me to operate a printing press? ...no. The Supreme Court of the United States has so ruled... That isn't necessarily final, of course. It is theoretically possible for the Supremes to rule contrary to the framers intent. Some justices seem eager to do so. So the question merely changes to whether we should seize the airwaves, as the Constitution provides, and then defend the Constitution from "all enemies, foreign and domestic", by taking out the supremes. Anyone? Anyone? --Len. PS I gather there's a weapons cache at Concord, Mass... |