| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
July 11th 03, 03:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#3
July 9th 03, 02:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Bert Craig wrote:
Now that the ITU treaty requirement re. CW is gone, (For all intents and purposes.) does that mean NCI's job is done? If not, what's next? EXTINCTION. |
|
#4
July 14th 03, 06:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article , (Brian) writes: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian) writes: Still no citation from Arnie concerning his claim that NCI is on record for less technical exams. Still no answer from you concerning these questions about your alleged /T5 operation: What callsign was used? What rigs and antennas were used? Who did the equipment belong to? What amateur bands and modes were used? What countries and continents were worked? How were the QSLs delivered? Why is it alleged? Because you haven't provided any information about or confirmation of your alleged operation. Then how do you know about it? |
|
#5
July 14th 03, 10:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Brian) wrote in message . com...
(N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian) writes: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian) writes: Still no citation from Arnie concerning his claim that NCI is on record for less technical exams. Still no answer from you concerning these questions about your alleged /T5 operation: What callsign was used? What rigs and antennas were used? Who did the equipment belong to? What amateur bands and modes were used? What countries and continents were worked? How were the QSLs delivered? Why is it alleged? Because you haven't provided any information about or confirmation of your alleged operation. Then how do you know about it? You have claimed here and elsewhere to have operated /T5 about a decade ago. But you provided no details, even when directly asked. So any reasonable person has cause to be skeptical. |
|
#6
July 15th 03, 11:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(N2EY) wrote in message . com...
(Brian) wrote in message . com... (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian) writes: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian) writes: Still no citation from Arnie concerning his claim that NCI is on record for less technical exams. Still no answer from you concerning these questions about your alleged /T5 operation: What callsign was used? What rigs and antennas were used? Who did the equipment belong to? What amateur bands and modes were used? What countries and continents were worked? How were the QSLs delivered? Why is it alleged? Because you haven't provided any information about or confirmation of your alleged operation. Then how do you know about it? You have claimed here and elsewhere to have operated /T5 about a decade ago. But you provided no details, even when directly asked. So any reasonable person has cause to be skeptical. Lemme think this through. After you and several minions have performed an exhaustive search concerning my operation in Somalia, and having turned up nothing, you want me to corroborate my own operation so that you'll be less skeptical? Ha! That's a good one. Go ahead and believe what you want to believe. You will anyway regardless of anything I could say. 73, Brian |
|
#7
July 15th 03, 05:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Brian) wrote in message . com...
(N2EY) wrote in message . com... (Brian) wrote in message . com... (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian) writes: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian) writes: Still no citation from Arnie concerning his claim that NCI is on record for less technical exams. Still no answer from you concerning these questions about your alleged /T5 operation: What callsign was used? What rigs and antennas were used? Who did the equipment belong to? What amateur bands and modes were used? What countries and continents were worked? How were the QSLs delivered? Why is it alleged? Because you haven't provided any information about or confirmation of your alleged operation. Then how do you know about it? You have claimed here and elsewhere to have operated /T5 about a decade ago. But you provided no details, even when directly asked. So any reasonable person has cause to be skeptical. Lemme think this through. After you and several minions I don't have any "minions". have performed an exhaustive search concerning my operation in Somalia, and having turned up nothing, you want me to corroborate my own operation so that you'll be less skeptical? Nope. I and some others have asked some basic, simple, straightforward questions about your alleged /T5 operations. You have repeatedly avoided answering any of them. Ha! That's a good one. Go ahead and believe what you want to believe. You will anyway regardless of anything I could say. Why don't you just answer the questions? |
|
#8
July 16th 03, 12:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(N2EY) wrote in message . com...
(Brian) wrote in message . com... (N2EY) wrote in message . com... (Brian) wrote in message . com... (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian) writes: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian) writes: Still no citation from Arnie concerning his claim that NCI is on record for less technical exams. Still no answer from you concerning these questions about your alleged /T5 operation: What callsign was used? What rigs and antennas were used? Who did the equipment belong to? What amateur bands and modes were used? What countries and continents were worked? How were the QSLs delivered? Why is it alleged? Because you haven't provided any information about or confirmation of your alleged operation. Then how do you know about it? You have claimed here and elsewhere to have operated /T5 about a decade ago. But you provided no details, even when directly asked. So any reasonable person has cause to be skeptical. Lemme think this through. After you and several minions I don't have any "minions". Perhaps they were bunions. have performed an exhaustive search concerning my operation in Somalia, and having turned up nothing, you want me to corroborate my own operation so that you'll be less skeptical? Nope. I and some others have asked some basic, simple, straightforward questions about your alleged /T5 operations. After having exhausted all other venues. You have repeatedly avoided answering any of them. Yes, that is correct. But if you do your research you'll find I have stated much of what you asked in previous posts to rrap. Get to work. Ha! That's a good one. Go ahead and believe what you want to believe. You will anyway regardless of anything I could say. Why don't you just answer the questions? How is it that you didn't believe me then, but you're willing to believe me now? I just don't get it. To be honest, I don't think there is any answer that will satisfy you. Brian |
|
#9
July 19th 03, 01:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#10
July 19th 03, 10:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article , (Brian) writes: Dick Carroll wrote in message ... Brian wrote: To be honest, I don't think there is any answer that will satisfy you. Brian At least not a truthful one. Well then, that's it. Jim isn't satisfied with truthful answers. No wonder he keeps asking. Nope. I haven't seen any truthful answers to my questions about your alleged /T5 operations. You're amazing. You didn't believe me then, but somehow you'll believe me now. To be honest, I don't think there is any answer that will satisfy you. 73, Brian |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
