Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Guessing" wrote in
news:QWCPa.913$Bd5.644@fed1read01: Someone squawked As an engineer myself, I can verfiy that lots of engineers have told me exactly that. Whether they would get a licence once code testing is abolished might be another matter. Nonsense and a big copout It happens to be the truth, whether you like it or not If you want a BS/MS/PHD Degree -- pass the tests Want a driver license -- take a test Want a job - take a drug test and physical exam and perhaps a professional test Want insurance -- take a physical exam Want to be an apprentice (JourneyPerson) -- take the test Want to advance in the Military -- take the test Pass the Bar (Legal that is) Pass Da Test Nurses CPR for sure and maybe ACLS Tests Sobriety Test -- Try to dodge this one et al tests Want an HF Ham license -- take the code and Technical/Rules et al test Code won't be included in that for much longer. I assume that since you just say 'take the test' about everything, that you must have no problem with that. I certainly don't! Otherwise we have CB and FRS. And one who listens on these bands ought to be totally inspired to get a Ham Ticket !!! Simple as that. You live in a 'black and white' world, don't you? Anyone who used the code as an excuse for not becoming a ham, just wasn't serious about it. An unsupported assertion, and untrue If 10 to 17 year olds can do it, why can't an engineer or any other college grad ??? Code aptitude and IQ are completely unrelated Did any of those "Engineers" get a No-Code Tech license ?? Yes, I did (although I did code eventually) Didn't think so !! |