Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alun Palmer wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in : Dee D. Flint wrote: "Bill Sohl" wrote in message ... "Guessing" wrote in message news:kTWPa.1427$Bd5.928@fed1read01... "Alun Palmer" wrote in message .4... "Guessing" wrote in news:bXVPa.1425$Bd5.445@fed1read01: Ask a lawyer about that one. Hey I want to be a BSEE, why do I have to take History classes ???? You don't have to take history classes in some schools to get a BSEE. Broaden the category to Socio-Humanistic electives or whatever equivalent term that your college uses and you will find that you do have to take a certain amount of them. And everyone regardless of major has to take English even though they should already be proficient at that before they get there. You have to take quite a few "unnecessary" courses in college to get a degree in any field. Unless you are a "non-traditional student" at old PSU, you have to take Physical Education classes. My son is taking Karate this semester, as a required course. It has no bearing on his eventual carreer, yet he may elect to not take it, and not graduate. He has to take some history, to and there are plenty of other classes that have a questionable relevence to his eventual carreer. Even the Electrical engineers have to take these classes. The idea is actually sound, as it helps produce a more well rounded individual. It also takes into account that a person may not have the same "core competencies" their entire career. A narrowly focused education may prepare a person for a carreer that eventually dissapears. - Mike KB3EIA - I might have known that you would think it was a good idea - I don't Thanks, Alun! I've switched fields 5 times in the course of one career. If I hadn't had a broad education, I wouldn't have been able to. I've always jumped on every educational opporunity I could. - Mike KB3EIA - |