Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dwight Stewart wrote in message ...
From the July 2003 issue (pg. 37) of PC World Magazine... A brazen new competitor to DSL and cable is "within striking distance of being the third major broadband pipe into the home," says FCC Chairman Michael Powell. Broadband of power line, or BPL (currently being offered in pilot programs by a dozen or so utilities around the country), promises to deliver high-speed Internet access straight from the electrical socket in your wall. Long written off as an also-ran technology, BPL has new spark, thanks to technical advances that address problems of interference and in-line transformers that scramble signals. The last hurdle will be getting FCC approval. Considering Powell's enthusiasm - the general belief that BPL will cost less than cable and DSL - a green light could be imminent. While everyone would obviously like cheaper broadband internet access, my principle concern is the possible interference with ham radio out here in the real world - the real world of corroded and rotted old power lines, decades old transformers and power stations, and the ancient (often poorly grounded) electrical wiring in old homes and buildings throughout this country. Like many others, I suspect this technology is going to have a dramatic impact on ham radio. It sure will, if it's allowed to be implemented. FCC Docket 03-104 addresses implementation of these systems. Comments close today. ARRL submitted a 120 page paper on the effects of the proposed systems. None of it is good news for hams. Does anyone know about these touted "advances that address problems of interference" mentioned above? Are these "advances" really going to prevent potential interference problems out here in the real world? Basically they come down to two ideas: 1) spectrum masking, which consists of not allowing the BPL systems to use frequencies in the ham bands. Which is fine until something nonlinear in the system causes intermodulation products, harmonics or other spurious signals to fall in the ham bands. This method was used to stop HomePlug and other in-building systems from tearing up 80 meters - AFTER our own W1RFI and other ARRL folks got the manufacturer to recognize the problem. 2) "improved modes and modulations", which permit the use of lower signal levels and hence lower signal leakage. Supposedly. The BIG problem is obvious to anyone who actually goes out and looks at a typical aerial distribution system. Lots of nice, long wires, way up in the air, running all over everyone's neighborhood. Put a little RF in them and watch it radiate. Heck, one of the biggest problems in access BPL is that the lines are "lossy" at RF. They're "lossy" because they radiate! You can read the comments of others and leave your own at the FCC website, via the ECFS system. Check out what the ARRL is saying and doing at the ARRL website. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Equipment | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Homebrew | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Equipment | |||
Power companies speading lies on BPL | General | |||
BPL industry take on why power lines are not antennas | Antenna |