Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why don't Real Hams you face the facts?
Trolls suck. Ignore them. SO in that light.... Is radio a great hobby? I sure think so. How about you? TS |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 23:44:44 +0100, "citizensband"
wrote: Time to stop whinging, and face the facts...Real Technology has overtaken you all! You poor troll. Don't you have anything to sell or auction? And, on the chance that you really are a CBer, did we not make it simple enough for you to get a ham license. The requirements are so minimal now that a two year old could get a ticket. You ought to try it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, I agree!! Furthermore, I think, IMHO, that that is what this newsgroup
should continue to be about---the exchange of valuable information and the education of those less versed but definitely interested ones (people like me) in the ways of the firebottle. People who are intelligent enough to be interested in 50 year old (or more), 50 lb. (or more) pieces of radio equipment usually are intelligent enough to refrain from senseless flaming. Those with more neanderthal sloping foreheads are the ones who seem to knock what we do. There's ideas to be shared, and tips to be learned in keeping these fine old pieces of gear WORKING!! Is radio a great hobby? I sure think so. How about you? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
citizensband wrote:
All the garbage about how you should even be allowed to operate a CB, unless you are able to build your own equipment. Real Hams will never be able to build a rig that even comes close to what's available off the shelf these days. Most people can't even be bothered, have no interest or don't have the time to build rigs anymore. Boatanchors should be used for exactly that, anchoring boats! Actually, the neat thing is that current technology makes homebrewing more fun than ever! I can now build one hell of a nice receiver using DSP technology and doing most of the IF processing in the digital domain, using off the shelf stuff. And I can get performance that beats anything on the shelf right now. What I want right now, though, is a PLL on a chip that will take a simple BCD or binary encoded frequency, and produce an unmodulated carrier. I would be surprised if someone hasn't built something like that already using one of those Sanyo mask-programmed microprocessors with the PLL on the chip like a lot of CBs use today. Doesn't have to be a PLL, it could be DDS too, but I want a single chip synthesizer that will tune 160 through 10 meters continuously and I'd like to avoid the microprocessor interface. Time to stop whinging, and face the facts...Real Technology has overtaken you all! Whinging? I'm not winging, I'm having a great time! Real technology makes this a great time to be a ham. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I must say, that sounds very impressive, although I really do doubt that he
understood all that......or is that the intent? Actually, the neat thing is that current technology makes homebrewing more fun than ever! I can now build one hell of a nice receiver using DSP technology and doing most of the IF processing in the digital domain, using off the shelf stuff. And I can get performance that beats anything on the shelf right now. What I want right now, though, is a PLL on a chip that will take a simple BCD or binary encoded frequency, and produce an unmodulated carrier. I would be surprised if someone hasn't built something like that already using one of those Sanyo mask-programmed microprocessors with the PLL on the chip like a lot of CBs use today. Doesn't have to be a PLL, it could be DDS too, but I want a single chip synthesizer that will tune 160 through 10 meters continuously and I'd like to avoid the microprocessor interface. Time to stop whinging, and face the facts...Real Technology has overtaken you all! Whinging? I'm not winging, I'm having a great time! Real technology makes this a great time to be a ham. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Opara Kvijji wrote:
I must say, that sounds very impressive, although I really do doubt that he understood all that......or is that the intent? I dunno, if one person understands it and happens to have a source for PLLs, I'll be happy. It's true, though, that I can go to the trash bins down the street, and pick up VCRs with wideband electronics that will carry from DC to 4 MHz, TV sets with great digital tuner stages, really slick sweep amplifier stages that can put out decent power across the whole HF band, and all kinds of nifty stuff. People complain about technology today making homebrewing impossible, but frankly I would have given my eyeteeth for this sort of salvage when I was a kid. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Ged" wrote in message ... In message , citizensband writes All the garbage about how you should even be allowed to operate a CB, unless you are able to build your own equipment. Real Hams will never be able to build a rig that even comes close to what's available off the shelf these days. Most people can't even be bothered, have no interest or don't have the time to build rigs anymore. Boatanchors should be used for exactly that, anchoring boats! Time to stop whinging, and face the facts...Real Technology has overtaken you all! tox Spoken like a true brain-dead CB-er. -- Ged Spoken like a brain-dead 'alleged' Ham, who thinks radio revolves around a soldering iron...it doesn't anymore. Things are changing, look what has happened to the Morse assessment! Even the RSGB have had the good sense to move into the twenty first century! HTH tox |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
.:\:/:. +-------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:. | PLEASE DO NOT | :.:\:\:/:/:.: | FEED THE TROLLS | :=.' - - '.=: | | '=(\ 9 9 /)=' | Thank you, | ( (_) ) | Management | /`-vvv-'\ +-------------------+ / \ | | @@@ / /|,,,,,|\ \ | | @@@ /_// /^\ \\_\ @x@@x@ | | |/ WW( ( ) )WW \||||/ | | \| __\,,\ /,,/__ \||/ | | | jgs (______Y______) /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 23:44:44 +0100, "citizensband"
wrote: Time to stop whinging, and face the facts...Real Technology has overtaken you all! oh ? i thought it was about the person behind the mic (key / camera ) and that persons permission to self-train in the art of communications. never did i think that AMATEUR RADIO was about technology. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On 16 Jul 2003 18:53:15 GMT, Leigh wrote:
.....and a true example of home-built radio was heard on 80m CW a week or so ago - a Russian with homemade equipment that rasped CW more than broke the carrier and was a wide signal. Sort of knocks the 'build your own' case for Gareth into a cocked hat - not easy to work or even work out who or where he was. thats the classic eastern european sound of homemade gear. that and the tone that starts high and goes low as the dah dah dah is sent. dont worry, you get used to it. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reflection Delay is it real??? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
Why don't Real Hams you face the facts? | Policy | |||
Why don't Real Hams you face the facts? | Boatanchors | |||
Why don't you Real Trolls face the facts? | Boatanchors |