Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ilgate.org,
K0HB wrote: Except in the USA, most amateurs do not labor under "sub-bands" based on mode. As an example Canadian amateur have no such restrictions. It's a source of continuing wonder to me that the FCC continues to arbitrarily slice and dice the bands based on mode, license class, power levels, and similar artificial constructs of their imagination. Not only that but the stupid allocation of the 7.00-7.100 as a CW only band makes 40 meters almost unusable outside of the U.S. That's our entire 40 meter band, and so we can't work the states without spilt operation, which doesn't often work because we are swamped with European brodcasters. We can't work locally, because by convention, we use ssb in the upper half and get destroyed by all those digital signals that come from the U.S. and clobber us. IMHO the best thing to do is open 7.050-7.100 for ssb in the U.S. and move the digital stuff to the old novice band. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson 972-54-608-069 Do sysadmins count networked sheep? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
If you value SW or HAM radio.... | Antenna | |||
FUD ALERT !!!!! (was With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind?) | General | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | General | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy |