LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old July 24th 03, 01:54 AM
Jon Bloom
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:11:25 -0400, Brian wrote:

Jon Bloom wrote in message
g...

But as you point out, nobody really knows what "operate" means in this
case. For example, if a person's entire use of Morse code is to copy
repeater IDs, which they do by laboriously copying down the dots and
dashes and then looking up the letters in a table, is that "operation"
of Morse? The survey doesn't say.


Hmmmm. Are you saying that the "Operate CW" numbers are inflated?


No, I'm saying the survey measures the respondents opinions of their own
levels of activity. What that means in objective terms is something on
which you're free to speculate, although I can't imagine what useful
result would obtain from such speculations.

Jon


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If you value SW or HAM radio.... yea right Antenna 60 June 12th 04 05:15 PM
FUD ALERT !!!!! (was With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind?) Carl R. Stevenson General 17 July 31st 03 11:11 PM
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? Dee D. Flint General 18 July 25th 03 01:13 AM
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? Dee D. Flint Policy 1 July 21st 03 08:01 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017