Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Radio Amateur KC2HMZ" wrote in message
news ![]() On 24 Jul 2003 03:28:04 GMT, ospam (Larry Roll K3LT) wrote: Memo to John, KC2HMZ: If I were you, I'd get my squelch fixed -- it doesn't seem to be working! That's because no mere squelch circuit could realistically be expected to cope with your noise level. For dealing with you, an attenuator and some serious filtering are required. 73 DE John, KC2HMZ Or, an on/off knob. Kim W5TIT --- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net Complaints to |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
If you value SW or HAM radio.... | Antenna | |||
FUD ALERT !!!!! (was With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind?) | General | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | General | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy |