With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind?

#35

July 29th 03, 08:06 AM

Ryan, KC8PMX

Posts: n/a

Exactly. As well as writing to their elected officials as well.

--
Ryan, KC8PMX
FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!)
--. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-.
... --. .... - . .-. ...
Though I've been a member of the ARRL longer than I've been a ham, I
often find that it is wiser to represent myself than let the ARRL do
it. We often have differing viewpoints.

Those who are not ARRL members can simply represent themselves to the
FCC.

Brian

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
If you value SW or HAM radio....	yea right	Antenna	60	June 12th 04 06:15 PM
FUD ALERT !!!!! (was With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind?)	Carl R. Stevenson	General	17	August 1st 03 12:11 AM
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind?	Dee D. Flint	General	18	July 25th 03 02:13 AM
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind?	Dee D. Flint	Policy	1	July 21st 03 09:01 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:44 PM.

Menu

About Us