Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #131   Report Post  
Old August 12th 03, 03:55 AM
Larry Roll K3LT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:


Brian: perhaps you can give me some kind of clue as to what the Hell you are
talking about?

Kim W5TIT


Kim:

You couldn't buy a clue if they were three for a dollar.

73 de Larry, K3LT

  #134   Report Post  
Old August 12th 03, 03:55 AM
Larry Roll K3LT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:


K3FK????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kim W5TIT


Kim:

That's an Amateur Extra-class 1x2 call sign, Kim. A very good one, in
fact! Unlike yours, it doesn't spell something that makes an inappropriate
reference to the female anatomy for the sake of inciting prurient interest
in the callsign's owner.

BTW -- why aren't you an Extra, Kim? Those written tests too tough
for you?

73 de Larry, K3LT

  #135   Report Post  
Old August 12th 03, 11:24 AM
No CW Test
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: Question for the No coders
From: (Len Over 21)
Date: 8/9/03 9:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

In article , Dwight Stewart
writes:

"N2EY" wrote:

(snip) And amateur radio does not exist to
serve other services. (snip)


Our public service is often service to other agencies (Red Cross, MARS,
and so on).

The "pool of trained operators" thing in 97.1 is
really about the idea of the ARS being a service
where the licensees (hams) are skilled both
operationally and technically, able to do a lot
of different things well. This distinguishes it
from other services, (snip)


The pool of trained operators concept relates to our ability to do the
other things outlined in 97.1 (public service, international goodwill, and
so on). At one time, code was a necessary part of at least some of that.
That is much less so today, hence the move to change the code testing
requirement.


Dwight, that statement in 97.1 is an OLD thing going back decades.


Len, you are an
old thing, going
back decades.

It was put in there to rationalize the existance of amateur radio among
all the other very commercial radio services.


You keep rationalizing
your existence here
among all the other
very amateur operators.

Three to four decades ago there MIGHT have been a "need" for "trained
operators" for the military draft. [the USA still had a draft and the
Cold
War was very warm indeed] Never mind that the military already HAD
ways of training in the "radio arts."


It just says "pool of trained
operators". Nothing about
the Morse code or military
draft or other services.

Does national defense or the various aid agencies NEED amateurs who
are "trained" in DX contesting and sitting around telling old war stories
about when Kode Vas King? I don't think so.


Does anyone NEED alleged
retired nonamateurs who are
"trained" in telling old war
stories about their nonamateur
exploits of fiftyplus years ago?

(snip) And public service. (snip)


I'm not aware of the use of code by any of the typical served agencies
(Red Cross, MARS, and so on).


Morse code use will keep out the eveavsdropers and bad people from
the content of communications, thus not letting them know the deep
dark, very secret ways of the ham. Secure.


Watch out for those
"eveavsdropers"!!!

So I've been told.


It seems sometimes
that no one can tell
you anything, Len. ;-)

(snip) Besides, everything hams do is either "for
enjoyment" or public service. Does that mean none
of it should be tested?


Huh? I thought I was fairly clear about all this. Code was once necessary
for the goals and purposes outlined in 97.1. At the very least, that is much
less so today (some would say it is not at all so today). That severely
weakens the justification for a unique license requirement. If the license
requirement is actually removed, code will then be tested on an equal
footing with the other operating modes (written theory). Nothing in that is
an argument for or against testing anything else.


Holier-than-thou old-timers just can't live with that, Dwight!


You are a holier-than-thou
old-timer, Len.

FCC "must" keep the "tradition" of morsemanship!

shrug


Are you Atlas?

LHA






  #137   Report Post  
Old August 13th 03, 01:57 AM
Dave Heil
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Len Over 21 wrote:

It's no use trying to show reality in here, Carl. shrug

These folk are obediant servants of the Church of St. Hiram and all
things in amateur radio are as they were back before WW2. To
show reality and all the other radio services' modes and operations
is tantamount to heresy. Blasphemy, even...


To quote from Leonard H. Anderson:

"YOU have NO authority to call anyone anything, demean them,
make fun of them, or anything else...yet YOU continue to do so.
That indicates the perversity of your control-freak psychosis."

What goes around often comes around very quickly.

Dave K8MN
  #138   Report Post  
Old August 13th 03, 03:13 AM
Kim W5TIT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
...
In article , "Kim W5TIT"


writes:

Your "don't look now" phrase is about as old as ROFLMAO, Larry.


But at least it's mine, Kim! Don't look now, but it's one of my Usenet
persona trademarks, as it were. And unlike you and your ROFLMAO,
It is usually followed by witty, insightful, and well-reasoned remarks on
the subject at hand.



And, I am
not jealous of this lady at all. More importantly, her sales volume

would
be of little significance to me, since I am not in sales. My point was

that
she probably has a lot of lookups because of people remembering her call
from a trade show and seeing if there's a link to the company she
represented.

Oh, hey, why don't you look her up and get a date, Larry. Looks like

you're
interested.

Kim W5TIT


Any normal, healthy male would be interested in Michelle, Kim. Sorry, I

know
you're not personally familiar with that concept from your own experience.
In fact, you had to come up with your "...one step closer to extinction"

Vanity
call sign, just to stir up some interest. Too bad it's the wrong kind!

73 de Larry, K3LT


You're stretching now, Larry. Running out of wit, are you?

Kim W5TIT


  #139   Report Post  
Old August 13th 03, 06:29 AM
Dave Heil
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kim W5TIT wrote:

SysD. If I put it over there we can remove the engine for backup and put
all the system data on SysA and SysB. The database is written and I'm near
finalization on coding. I should be able to develop a test environment over
the weekend. If you will create a small database of around 250 records, we
should then be able to test next week. Hopefully, we'll be ready for the
launch end of Q3!
"Dave Heil" wrote in message
...
Kim W5TIT wrote:

"Dave Heil" wrote in message
...
Mike Coslo wrote:

Larry Roll K3LT wrote:
In article ,
(N2EY)
writes:


Fun fact: Check the lookup counter in QRZ.com for W5YI.

73 de Jim, N2EY


Jim:

W5YI's QRZ record seems to be missing the lookup counter! OTOH,
Michelle, KC0MYV, seems to be breaking all records on that

account!

Perhaps we can get Vipul a date?

My guess would be, not with one hundred dollar bills pinned to his

shirt
though my friend K3FK's adage comes to mind: "They never made a trash
can for which there wasn't a lid".

Dave K8MN


K3FK????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Does that call hold some special significance for you, Kim?

Dave K8MN


Nope. Just like the call.


I didn't understand the significance of
"K3FK????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" His father was W3FK.

What's with the strange stuff at the top of your post?

Dave K8MN
  #140   Report Post  
Old August 14th 03, 12:16 AM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes:

You're stretching now, Larry. Running out of wit, are you?


Larrie can't "run out of" something he never had... :-)
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Noise and Loops Question Tony Angerame Antenna 4 August 24th 04 11:12 PM
Stacking Distance Question. More Information ab5mm Antenna 8 June 5th 04 09:18 AM
Stupid question G5RV Ken Bessler Antenna 17 January 9th 04 01:06 PM
QEI INC. QUINDAR RADIO UNIT TELEMETRY QUESTION got from hamfest john private smith General 0 November 22nd 03 05:19 AM
Question about attenuators ... Doug McLaren Antenna 2 August 31st 03 05:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017