Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brian Kelly" wrote:
Beats me, ask those who repeatedly claim that eliminating the code tests will by some mysterious means or another "push the hobby/ service forward". Which experience has already demonstrated is complete BS. Well, I suppose one could argue that those without code ability have pushed the hobby/service forward by just being there (shear numbers do help Amateur Radio). Of course, that is not likely to be an argument that satisfies you, but it was the only thing I could come up with at this moment. However, I think even those with code ability would agree that at least some have walked away from ham radio because of the code testing requirement. Would one of those have pushed the hobby/service forward? We'll obviously never know (especially since we're not even clear on what that phrase means). The difference is that us coders don't go around bleating about how we "push the hobby/service forward". Which is one of the bogus battle cries of the free lunchers. (snip) Well, with the amount of noise those with code ability make in general, it would be a little hard to notice even if they did. ![]() The rest of your message seems more to be a declaration than a discussion so I'll let it go unanswered. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Noise and Loops Question | Antenna | |||
Stacking Distance Question. More Information | Antenna | |||
Stupid question G5RV | Antenna | |||
QEI INC. QUINDAR RADIO UNIT TELEMETRY QUESTION got from hamfest | General | |||
Question about attenuators ... | Antenna |