LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old July 31st 03, 03:18 PM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dick Carroll; wrote:

Dwight Stewart wrote:


In my opinion, the
current written tests address the realistic needs and goals of Amateur
Radio, while the code test does not.





Why of course Dwight! Tha makes the test requirements easy and non-existant.
What more could you want?


There seems to be a bigger picture that the NCTA's are having trouble
grasping.

After their victory, their people - in this case, *all* those who
oppose Morse code testing are coming out of the woodwork. And they seem
to be having problems recognizing their new resposibility. Dwight and I
are not too different on the requirements to become a Ham. The problem
is that a lot of other people in his camp have some drastically
different ideas of what is realistic or reasonable.

Those are the people who need to be reigned in.

Question is, are the NCTA's up to the task?


- Mike KB3EIA -

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Noise and Loops Question Tony Angerame Antenna 4 August 24th 04 10:12 PM
Stacking Distance Question. More Information ab5mm Antenna 8 June 5th 04 08:18 AM
Stupid question G5RV Ken Bessler Antenna 17 January 9th 04 12:06 PM
QEI INC. QUINDAR RADIO UNIT TELEMETRY QUESTION got from hamfest john private smith General 0 November 22nd 03 04:19 AM
Question about attenuators ... Doug McLaren Antenna 2 August 31st 03 04:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017