"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
...
In article , "Kim W5TIT"

writes:

Kim:

One hundred percent of my postings provide what you call "literate,
logical, and intelligent" arguments for you and others to respond to in
the same manner.


Now, Larry, if that were true, then we'd be having intelligent
communication
rather than this blather. You are about as bright as a 2-watt light
bulb.


Yet, you usually just toss dismissive one-liners,
or, just a simple "ROFLMAO." You have never demonstrated any
capability to produce "literate, logical, or intelligent" commentary in
this newsgroup whatsoever.


The reason you have missed it is because you are incapable of recognizing
anything intelligent, Larry. Like I said you're about as bright as a
2-watt
lightbulb.


And it's not just my postings which you
seem incapable of dealing with in an intelligent manner. You are
universally childish, immature, and just plain dumb in all of your
replies to each and every participant in this newsgroup -- and this
includes those with which you merely indicate agreement and call
it "participation."


You are not worthy to judge my posts, Larry. They are far superior to
your
poor intellect.

Kim:

You are truly amazing. Amazingly predictable, that is. In this last
round
of responses, all you've done is prove me right by simply parroting things
I've already said -- about you! No original thought whatsoever. Nothing
new, nothing original. Ever.

You are so completely out of your intellectual depth that it is truly
a sad thing to witness on a daily basis. Have you no pride, woman?

73 de Larry, K3LT


Well, at least you can spell the word "intellectual." Now, could you
start
practicing it? Go ahead, challenge me. I'd like to see something
intelligent from you for a change. When you do that, I will respond in
kind...

Ok, Kim, that's easy. Please provide a logical, rational, and convincing
argument justifying your call sign, giving proof that it is not demeaning
to women, and that it cannot possibly give a negative image of amateur
radio operators to the general public, including adults who are concerned
about the exposure of young children, particularly young boys, to things
which tend to create negative sexual stereotypes.

I hope this is "intelligent" enough for you. Quite frankly, I don't think
you
can handle it. Prove me wrong, if you can.

73 de Larry, K3LT


I got one for you, Larry. Here we go: the next time I see something logical
and intellectual from you, I'll respond, OK?

Kim W5TIT