LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old August 4th 03, 12:24 PM
Brian Kelly
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message gy.com...
"Kim W5TIT" wrote in message
...
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
y.com...

"Bert Craig" wrote in message
. net...
That's because it not supposed to. It "forces" the newbie to get a

taste
of
CW. Then it's up to the individual to either take him/herself further

or
drop it entirely. Many will never know if CW truly interested them

because
they will not have been made to even try.


Exactly. It's nice to see it so neatly. It's the same reason that

students
are required to study a number of items which they may or may not pursue

in
the future.


Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Then I say we test on every mode there is. If you support that for CW,

then
surely you support it for other modes.

Kim W5TIT


No problem. I'm ready. Are you?


SPANK! Yee-haw!


Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCVEC Position on Code Chic N Pox General 1 July 31st 03 05:23 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM
NCVEC Position on Code Phil Kane Policy 0 July 31st 03 03:30 AM
NCVEC Position on Code Jim Hampton Policy 0 July 31st 03 12:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017