Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message igy.com...
"Brian" wrote in message om... S. Hanrahan wrote in message . .. On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 14:38:36 GMT, "Dee D. Flint" wrote: The exam does not exclude anyone who cares to make the effort to learn. And Farnsworth IS Morse since it relates a letter directly to a sound without counting dots and dashes. Actually the Farnsworth method is Morse Code It is not. Only at 20 WPM does Farnsworth and Morse use the same character and word rate. Nowhere is there a definition that says the character rate and word rate MUST be the same for it to be Morse. Then it's not Morse Code. There is standard spacing and Farnsworth spacing and the variety of spacing that you hear on the air. There are some really fine operators who have near perfect standard spacing but the rest of us vary. That doesn't mean we aren't sending Morse. It means that we are desparately trying to, except in the case of DICK/W0EX who purposely sends poor code in order to thwart the computer code readers. He should be cited. If you read the manuals on Morse, they give recommended element, character, and word spacings for standard operation but that is all. Recommended? It does not mandate that the relative spacing meet any particular standard to be considered Morse code. So you say that Morse cannot be defined, yet the FCC demands you pass an exam that has barred people from the medium and high frequencies. It is whatever you want it to be. hihi That doesn't sound like good government to me. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Brian" wrote in message om... It does not mandate that the relative spacing meet any particular standard to be considered Morse code. So you say that Morse cannot be defined, yet the FCC demands you pass an exam that has barred people from the medium and high frequencies. It is whatever you want it to be. Morse code is very clearly defined. Each letter, number, etc has a defined combination of dots and dashes. There is no ambiguity whatsoever. For normal conversational speeds (13wpm to 20wpm), the standard spacing allows one to develop a natural, easy rhythm. For low speed operation (less than 13wpm), it is better to have the letter speed be at least 13 but spaces between the letters. It's actually much easier to copy that way as you hear the letter as a distinct sound rather than counting dashes and dots. On the other hand, high speed ops may choose to change the ratio of the length of dashes to dots as it may be clearer than the "standard" spacing. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NCI filed Petition for Rulemaking Aug. 13 | Policy | |||
FYI: QRZ Forum - NCVEC Petition & Comments | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
Sign in the petition against the abuse of the Band Plan forward this message to your buddies) | Dx | |||
My Comments On RM-10740, the "Wi-Fi" Petition | Policy |