LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Report Post  
Old August 29th 03, 04:08 PM
Bert Craig
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Keith wrote in message ink.net...
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

Enter in the number RM-10787, fill out the address
information and upload or type in your comments on
the elimination of morse code testing as a requirement
to operate on HF.


Thanks Keith,

Comments submitted. I hope the FCC is in listening mode. :-)

--
73 de Bert
WA2SI


Egbert C. Craig, Jr. August 29, 2003
WA2SI

Re. RM-10787

To whom it may concern:

Undoubtedly, there will be many comments filed re. this petition.
Therefore, I will be brief and to the point. Although I am not new to
radio and earned my GROL long before my amateur radio license, I am a
relative newcomer to amateur radio. As such, I feel that I can offer
an alternative view to many of the "old timers."

I believe that there is still a very important place for minimal Morse
code proficiency testing in U.S. amateur radio licensing. I've been
told that "proficiency" is the technically correct term, however, I do
not feel 5-wpm represents Morse proficiency. I feel that the current
5-wpm Element 1 test is sufficient to require an individual to learn
the Morse characters so that s/he may then make an educated decision
as to whether or not s/he wishes to pursue CW further.

I would like to dispel two myths that I have repeatedly heard/read in
the argument for dropping Element 1:

· The current Element 1 test acts as a filter to keep out Cbers and
other "insufficiently-dedicated" individuals.
· The current Element 1 test acts as a deterrent to newcomers to the
hobby/service.

Along with being an amateur radio "newbie," I am also a Cber and
Element 1 did not deter me in any way, shape, or form from upgrading
my license class and earning HF privileges. If during the course of
reviewing the comments filed re. RM-10787, this demographic is
referred to while supporting the removal of Element 1, please do not
include me. This "newbie" wholeheartedly supports the retention of
Element 1 testing for the General and Extra license class licenses.

In closing, I would also like to remind those who believe that Morse
code testing serves no "regulatory purpose" in amateur radio that
there is an intangible quality at stake here too. It is part of our
culture and tradition and therefore should not be removed from the
curriculum.

Thank you for your time and attention.


Sincerely,


Egbert C. Craig, Jr.
WA2SI
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 09:08 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 09:08 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 09:08 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 04:23 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017