"Dick Carroll;" wrote


http://www.qsl.net/n1ea/FIST_FCC_Petition_8-30-303.pdf


Perhaps FISTS should consider sending this in as a comment to be
considered with RM-10787, rather than a separate petition.

If FCC grants the "no Morse test" petition, then it is unlikely to roll
back that decision at a later date.

73, Hans, K0HB




--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Hans Kohb" wrote in message
news:b309ce148a7d07e18fe1e709110785b7.128005@mygat e.mailgate.org...
"Dick Carroll;" wrote


http://www.qsl.net/n1ea/FIST_FCC_Petition_8-30-303.pdf


Perhaps FISTS should consider sending this in as a comment to be
considered with RM-10787, rather than a separate petition.

If FCC grants the "no Morse test" petition, then it is unlikely to roll
back that decision at a later date.

73, Hans, K0HB

I suspect that this will work equally as well as a comment since the FCC
will be required to weigh all the diverging and conflicting petitions that
have already been submitted to come up with whatever ruling they may decide
to put out. There are now at least seven different petitions filed although
not all are yet open to comments. The fact that it is a petition may even
give it more weight than just a comment.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
gy.com...


I suspect that this will work equally as well as a comment since the FCC
will be required to weigh all the diverging and conflicting petitions that
have already been submitted to come up with whatever ruling they may
decide
to put out. There are now at least seven different petitions filed
although
not all are yet open to comments. The fact that it is a petition may even
give it more weight than just a comment.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Having not seen a public notice from the FCC on ANY of the petitions,
it would appear that NONE of them are formally open for comment.

If I missed an official FCC public notice, I'd appreciate it if someone
could tell me the date it was released. (I check the "Daily Digest" and
the Federal Register daily ... though it's possible I could have overlooked
one ...)

Carl - wk3c

"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote in message
...

Having not seen a public notice from the FCC on ANY of the petitions,
it would appear that NONE of them are formally open for comment.

If I missed an official FCC public notice, I'd appreciate it if someone
could tell me the date it was released. (I check the "Daily Digest" and
the Federal Register daily ... though it's possible I could have
overlooked
one ...)

Carl - wk3c


The ARRL website has direct links.

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2003/08/29/2/?nc=1
FCC Invites Comments on Six Morse Code-Related Petitions


Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
gy.com...

"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote in message
...

Having not seen a public notice from the FCC on ANY of the petitions,
it would appear that NONE of them are formally open for comment.

If I missed an official FCC public notice, I'd appreciate it if someone
could tell me the date it was released. (I check the "Daily Digest" and
the Federal Register daily ... though it's possible I could have
overlooked
one ...)

Carl - wk3c


The ARRL website has direct links.

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2003/08/29/2/?nc=1
FCC Invites Comments on Six Morse Code-Related Petitions

The ARRL has direct links to (some) of the *petitions* that the
FCC has put into "docket items" on their website.

There is no link to a Public Notice from the FCC, seeking comments
on *any* of the petitions, nor has one been published by the FCC
to the best of my knowledge, and it certainly hasn't been published
in the Federal Register. I follow those sorts of things because I am
involved in radio regulatory matters professionally.

Technically, the FCC hasn't asked for comments yet ...

Carl - wk3c

And, the FCC upheld its R&O in 98-143, denying all petitions
for reconsideration asking for reinstatement of higher speed
Morse tests.

Carl - wk3c

Does NCI I have the latest 10 Codes out yet?

"Keith" wrote in message
nk.net...

The same old Morse code is necessary for ham radio HF operation
line of thinking. There is nothing that prevents anyone from
learning Morse code if the FCC drops the Morse code test & requirement
for General and Extra Class license holders so their petition is
silly.

--
Best Regards, Keith AOL IM:kilowattradio
NW Oregon Radio http://kilowatt-radio.org/


Nice CB page you have there.
I guess you are the future of Ham Radio?

God help us all.....

"Dick Carroll;" wrote in message ...
It isn't on the FCC's website yet but you can read it here....


http://www.eham.net/articles/6371


Enjoy!


I thought that FISTS sold themselves as a non-political club?

(Brian) wrote in message . com...
"Dick Carroll;" wrote in message ...
It isn't on the FCC's website yet but you can read it here....


http://www.eham.net/articles/6371


Enjoy!


I thought that FISTS sold themselves as a non-political club?

Don't use the term "I thought", we all know what that means in your case.

"Keith" wrote in message
nk.net...
On 1 Sep 2003 07:25:35 GMT,
Dick Carroll; in wrote:
Sri...you will be referrred to this URL :

http://www.qsl.net/n1ea/FIST_FCC_Petition_8-30-303.pdf



"Dick Carroll;" wrote:

It isn't on the FCC's website yet but you can read it here....

http://www.eham.net/articles/6371

Enjoy!


The same old Morse code is necessary for ham radio HF operation
line of thinking. There is nothing that prevents anyone from
learning Morse code if the FCC drops the Morse code test & requirement
for General and Extra Class license holders so their petition is
silly.

--
Best Regards, Keith AOL IM:kilowattradio
NW Oregon Radio http://kilowatt-radio.org/
_Give SCO $699 for using Linux or the Penguin gets it._
Torvalds: _They are smoking crack._

No Keith, it is not silly. You are just one of those that are too lazy to
learn, and want to change the whole license structure to accomidate you.

Dan/W4NTI