LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2   Report Post  
Old September 1st 03, 04:00 PM
Dee D. Flint
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Hans Kohb" wrote in message
news:b309ce148a7d07e18fe1e709110785b7.128005@mygat e.mailgate.org...
"Dick Carroll;" wrote


http://www.qsl.net/n1ea/FIST_FCC_Petition_8-30-303.pdf


Perhaps FISTS should consider sending this in as a comment to be
considered with RM-10787, rather than a separate petition.

If FCC grants the "no Morse test" petition, then it is unlikely to roll
back that decision at a later date.

73, Hans, K0HB


I suspect that this will work equally as well as a comment since the FCC
will be required to weigh all the diverging and conflicting petitions that
have already been submitted to come up with whatever ruling they may decide
to put out. There are now at least seven different petitions filed although
not all are yet open to comments. The fact that it is a petition may even
give it more weight than just a comment.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 09:08 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 09:08 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 09:08 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 09:08 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 04:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017