| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message hlink.net... I think total ellimination is equivilant to negotiations with a terrorist organization (NCI). Dan/W4NTI I think that characterization is totally out of line and is equivalent to the "law of usenet" that goes something like "the first one to equate the other to Hitler automatically loses the argument." Carl - wk3c |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message hlink.net... I think total ellimination is equivilant to negotiations with a terrorist organization (NCI). Dan/W4NTI I think that characterization is totally out of line and is equivalent to the "law of usenet" that goes something like "the first one to equate the other to Hitler automatically loses the argument." Carl - wk3c I understand your point of view Carl. Down heah in Dixie we call that 'eat up with the dumbass'. Your NCI organization is nothing but a bunch of whinney crybaby lazy me generation morons. You know it, and we know it. Now just go off and whine in your corner. The truth hurts, eh? Dan/W4NTI |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:40:03 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this
mindspring.com wrote: "Carl R. Stevenson" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message hlink.net... I think total ellimination is equivilant to negotiations with a terrorist organization (NCI). Dan/W4NTI I think that characterization is totally out of line and is equivalent to the "law of usenet" that goes something like "the first one to equate the other to Hitler automatically loses the argument." Carl - wk3c I understand your point of view Carl. Down heah in Dixie we call that 'eat up with the dumbass'. Your NCI organization is nothing but a bunch of whinney crybaby lazy me generation morons. You know it, and we know it. Now just go off and whine in your corner. The truth hurts, eh? Is the truth that you are referring to the fact that other countries are dropping the code requirement as fast as they can? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message thlink.net...
"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote in message ... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message hlink.net... I think total ellimination is equivilant to negotiations with a terrorist organization (NCI). Dan/W4NTI I think that characterization is totally out of line and is equivalent to the "law of usenet" that goes something like "the first one to equate the other to Hitler automatically loses the argument." Carl - wk3c I understand your point of view Carl. Down heah in Dixie we call that 'eat up with the dumbass'. No doubt. Dumb is written all over your post. Your NCI organization is nothing but a bunch of whinney crybaby lazy me generation morons. Odd. I think the PCTA are the whiney crybaby generation who think if it was good enough for their grandpappies, that its good enough for everyone since. "I had to learn it, whah, whah, whah." I'm not buying it. All we've asked you to come up with was a valid reason to retain the code exam. That should be simple enough, right? You know it, and we know it. Now just go off and whine in your corner. The truth hurts, eh? Does it? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|