Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dick Carroll" wrote in message ... "Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL" wrote: "Clint" rattlehead@computronDOTnet wrote in : I heard from the latest audio news that more nations around the world are dropping thier morse code testing requirements. makes you wonder if the VEC's who petitioned to return a higher code speed test for extra class hams are just doing so to fight the tide. Clint KB5ZHT The ARRL has a destructive agenda. If they cared about amateur radio as much as for the amount of money their bank account, they would have said something at the last world conference. It's all lip service and lies to try and get hams like me to hold our piece and hope we don't feel like we're being lied to again. No, Vince, I believe you're way off base here. ARRL has a real problem-It wants to do what is best for ham radio, and divining what that is is not a simple chore, by any means. Then you have the other facets of the problem, which include but certainly are not limited to, the vast array of opinions among hams, members and otherwise, then there's the FCC and their own budget constraints, etc, etc etc. But NO, you'll never get me to believe that ARRL as an organization has anything but the best interests of ham radio at heart. I do believe that at times they get a little off course, but they seem to manage to make the necessary corrections. Dick I'm in shock, as I fully agree with Dick on that. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: OLD ARRL and AMECO HAM Publications, old QST's | Boatanchors | |||
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | General | |||
FS: OLD ARRL and AMECO HAM Publications | Boatanchors | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | General | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy |