LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18   Report Post  
Old September 15th 03, 12:16 AM
Dee D. Flint
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Clint" rattlehead@computronDOTnet wrote in message
...
well, I was speaking mostly about the nations that seem to
fight us tooth-and-nail on most issues we bring before them,
particularly the UN... my point was that I wouldn't expect
a sympathetic ear on thier end if they all have come to
an agreement amongst themselves and WE are the
outstanding oppinion. That is to say, if the reports i've heard
and that are echoed in here that many nations are dropping
thier code requirements, and more are planning on doing the
same, and of ALL countries to fight it the USA tries,
I wouldn't hold my breath.


Each country is free to do as their respective governing bodies wish to do.
There is no "fighting" involved.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: OLD ARRL and AMECO HAM Publications, old QST's Al Schapira Boatanchors 0 May 28th 04 07:53 PM
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 Radionews General 0 March 4th 04 09:52 PM
FS: OLD ARRL and AMECO HAM Publications Al Schapira Boatanchors 0 January 23rd 04 09:19 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews General 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? K0HB Policy 68 August 4th 03 02:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017