| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Arnie Macy" wrote in message ... "Bill Sohl" wrote in part ... So far the UK, Netherlands and several other countries have done exactly that. Once all code testing is ended by the FCC will you accept that action as supporting the FCC position that morse isn't needed to be a "fully qualified ham?" Additionally, I don't recall anywhere seeing any FCC reference to the concept of a "fully qualified ham". Is that a new license class? __________________________________________________ ______________ I believe that a person who aspires to be an Amateur Extra Class *should* be able to send/receive Morse Code at a minmum level. You are certainly entitled to believe whatever you want. You and I both know that even if testing for CW goes away, the mode will remain a very popular one in the ARS for a very long time. Which is just another reason there is no NEED for any morse testing at all. To me, at least, it just makes sense that a person holding the highest class of license should have a working (practical) knowledge of the second most popular mode we have. How about knowing Spanish, Chineese, etc...two of the most popular languages used on the air after English? Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bill Sohl" wrote ...
How about knowing Spanish, Chinese, etc...two of the most popular languages used on the air after English? __________________________________________________ ___________ Wow, now that's a bit of a stretch, isn't it? Arnie - KT4ST |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | Dx | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 | General | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #619 | Dx | |||
| Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #619 | General | |||