Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message ... In article , "Carl R. Stevenson" writes: However, the requirements for licensure should be reasonable and rational, and while the written tests meet that criteria, the requirement for Morse proficiency no longer does. Carl - wk3c Carl: Jim, N2EY, just said, in so many words, With all due respect to Jim, just because he said it doesn't make it true. (no matter how many words he used :-) that since today's amateur radio equipment can no longer be designed, built, or serviced by any but the tiny handful of hams who possess professional-grade technical knowledge, skill, and facilities, That's absurd ... just as those who want to (and don't have a legitimate physical limitation that prevents it) *could* learn Morse at some arbitrary speed, anyone who wants to (except, someone who's truly mentally deficient) can learn the skills necessary to design, build, and service equipment comparable in performance to (or better than) off the shelf commercial equipment. Even "custom ASICs" can be affordably created in the ham's home workshop with free or inexpensive software tools that run on any reasonable PC, using FPGAs and other programable logic devices ... and they can do significant signal processing at rates higher than can be done in software on a PC (though using the PC to do some signal processing is useful and practical in some applications). Some of the fancy LCD displays require special manufacturing techniques and equipment and would be prohibitively expensive for "one off" and small quantities, but they can be replaced by a "soft" display on a computer screen if those sorts of bells and whistles are desired ... check out "Ham Radio Deluxe" ... one hell of a slick control program, that's free by the way, from Simon Brown, HB9DRV, and Peter Halpin, PE1MHO, (NCI Director Emeritus, holder of the 1st 6m QRP (=5W) DXCC, and other awards and omgosh ... a no-coder) at: http://www.kns.ch/sysgem/hb9drv/HamRadioDeluxe.htm Building and servicing are simply a matter of technique. SMT parts can be soldered by hand with a small, low wattage iron (even 200 pin QFPs ... I've done it many times) or with a simple hot air reflow soldering system (you can buy one, or could build one ... I've reflowed modest sized PCBs with a heat gun and some care. The techniques are different than the old "thru-hole" methods, but they are really no more difficult and are certainly within reach of anyone who cares to learn. (and, amateur radio is *supposed* to encourage the learning of useful technical skills, advancing the art, etc.) that most of the technical knowledge in the present written tests can also be eliminated as a licensing requirement. I totally agree. So, you would prefer that the amateur ranks be centered on appliance operators (as long as they can beep fast)??? That's the death warrant for amateur radio if it ever becomes totally that way. Reducing the technical skill of amateurs to your level and keeping "Morse as king" may make you FEEL superior, Larry, but it's really the TRUE "dumbing down" of the amateur radio service ... Other than as a recreational activity in the ARS (which is fine), the world has passed Morse by. What's needed in the "pool of trained operators" is no longer a cadre of Morseists, but folks who have the technical knowledge and skill to build, field, and maintain systems that can meet the communications needs of EMS agencies ... and that's at a level of technology far beyond OOK Morse. In what way is it "reasonable and rational" for someone to know Ohm's Law or even the most basic digital theory, if they'll never have to use it in their actual practice as a radio amateur? Ohm's Law is a tool that can be used for many things ... biasing circuits, figuring out what size wire gauge is necessary to carry a given current with what voltage drop, and on and on ... and it's a simple equation, whose permutations can be learned in about 10 minutes ... equally useful are the formulae for inductive and capacitive reactance, resonance, etc., etc. These are all basic things that every amateur should know and understand. (Do they all? No. Should they? Yes!!!) I say it isn't, and nothing could prove this better than eliminating the code testing requirements for the same reason. That's absurd ... After all, code testing has the effect of exposing prospective radio amateurs to what is always going to be a practical and useful communications tool which allows radio amateurs to practice basic radio communication with only entry-level skill and technology. Certain chemicals are "useful" in agriculture ... should everyone who wants to eat a salad be required to be sprayed with them ("exposed to them") against his/her will before being allowed to do so? (Yes, it's an extreme and contrived example, but the principle is EXACTLY the same.) If we eliminate the code testing requirement, we therefore demonstrate that basic communications skills are no longer necessary to be a licensed amateur radio operator. Larry ... most folks don't WANT to communicate via Morse. Nothing prevents you from doing so, but to assert that everyone must prove they can before they can do anything on HF is pointless and counter to the interests of the future of ham radio. (The governments of the world and even the IARU have come to realize this ... that YOU "don't get it" is irrelevant.) I, for one, would like to think that the present syllabus of the written tests still represents "basic communications skills." So, which will it be? Code testing, written testing, both, or neither? The sensible option ... no code testing. Adequate written testing. That answer is obvious. Carl - wk3c |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|