LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old October 3rd 03, 06:33 PM
Bert Craig
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message
hlink.net...
Why should the FCC simply grandfather the Tech (no code) to Tech plus

(code
and Novice test) ??

The Tech (no code) has no HF test questions. (as I understand it). Thus
there is no reason a Tech (no code) would, or should be qualified to

operate
HF.


It's a "gimme," Dan. In other words, some may be hoping that by "giving"
no-code Technicians an "unearned" slice of HF, it can be called an agreeable
compromise to retain Element 1 for the Extra. (Perhaps even the General.) I
personally don't think it'll work, but the FCC might go for it. Who knows?

--
73 de Bert
WA2SI




 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing Arf! Arf! General 0 January 11th 04 09:09 PM
Pixie 2 freq change question jim&julz Homebrew 2 December 22nd 03 04:13 PM
Pixie 2 freq change question jim&julz Homebrew 0 December 22nd 03 05:32 AM
Change of frequency of EM signal Tommaso Parrinello Antenna 0 November 27th 03 04:26 PM
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source Tarmo Tammaru Antenna 18 August 30th 03 03:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017