Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() But it would be almost exactly what ARRL asked for 5 years ago, when they proposed that Techs get HF CW privs. The "Tech-with-HF" semi-class is a classic designed-by-a-committee confuser. If a Tech passes 5 wpm code, but doesn't upgrade, he/she gets HF Novice privs for as long as he/she holds onto the Element 1 CSCE. But said CSCE can't be used for Element 1 credit after 365 days. OTOH, an expired Novice or Tech-with-code license document of any vintage is good for Element 1 credit. Pre-March-21-1987 expired Tech licenses are also good for Element 3 credit. So someone who passed the 5 wpm code test in front of a single volunteer examiner 50+ years ago and got a Novice or Tech license as a result gets credit for Element 1, but someone who took the test 366 days ago gets no credit ofr their CSCE. And an expired-beyond-grace-period General, Advanced or Extra license gets no credit at all. Anyone think having the amateur license test/class regs make sense is a priority to FCC? 73 de Jim, N2EY Likely some non-ham brearucrat had to write these rules. Said person probably didn't understand that someone who had a general or extra license had to pass a higher speed code test, which in turn qualifies them to do 5WPM. He probably though copying 5WPM was completely different than 13 or 20 (in a sense it is a bit different but not enough to disqualify someone for 5). |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Change of frequency of EM signal | Antenna | |||
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source | Antenna |