Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"N2EY" wrote in message
... In article , "Carl R. Stevenson" writes: "N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , "Carl R. Stevenson" writes: "N2EY" wrote in message ... [snip] One of the big problems is the "nobody loses/nobody gets a windfall" paradigm. The NCI and NCVEC Petitions are "nobody loses/nobody gets a windfall" propositions ... since a tech now gets HF privs if he/she passes a 5 wpm code test, the elimination of the test would not be a "windfall" if all techs got the same privs as the old "TechPlus" ... Everything else stays the same. Yup. And so we wind up with a continuation of the VHF/UHF heavy, HF/MF light entry level setup that is an artifact of the old S25.5. I doubt that ... I expect that a very large percentage of techs will rapidly upgrade to at least general, if not extra, once the code test is gone. Maybe - but look at what has happened with the Tech Plus: It's been 3-1/2 years since restructuring. No new Tech Pluses in all that time. All existing Tech Pluses changed to Techs when renewing or vanity call granted. Many Tech Pluses needed no additional testing at all to get a General. Yet we still have about 50% of pre-restructuring Tech Pluses on the books.Which means many of the existing Tech Pluses simply haven't yet bothered to upgrade to General. But by your own figuring, (about) 50% of them HAVE ... The idea of "eliminate the code test and give techs "techplus" privs is logical, takes nothing away from anyone, and gives nobody a "freebie." From the standpoint of written testing, anyway. It's not a "freebie" in any way ... current Tech+ and "Tech with code credit" have access to (some) HF ... if the code test is no longer a requirement for HF access, it's only fair that Techs have access ... they've passed the same written as (most) Tech+ ... (I would find it hard to believe that "old Techs" who had credit for both 5 wpm and the full General written wouldn't have upgraded to AT LEAST General ... (however if someone didn't care and didn't that's no skin off my nose ...) Didja know that some time back QCWA (you're a member, I'm not, even though I'm "qualified") asked FCC to grant all pre-Nov.22-1968 Generals and Advanceds a free upgrade to Extra? Talk about freebies! Yes ... I believe that was in their comments in 98-143 and NCI opposed it, along with the NCVECs ... we both said, "If they want to upgrade, they should have to take the written element(s) that they need to get there. No freebies!" In the case of NCVEC, there may be more petitions and proposals. They have already hinted at same. I'm not part of that group, so I can't speak for them ... if they file a petition seeking to water down the writtens or expand the phone bands, I'll oppose it vigorously (personally). Same here. But does Fred often take no for an answer? He sure is used to getting his way. There is more to the NCVECs than Fred ... I would expect the ARRL rep to oppose such an action ... I think these proposals fully meet the "nobody loses/nobody gets a windfall" paradigm. Some would say that getting full privileges with no code test was a windfall, but I'm not gonna go there.... The governments of the world don't seem to hold that view, so you'd be up against the "heavy hitters." The governments of the world don't make FCC rules. The FCC was part of one of those governments of the world that supported the elimination of the requirement at WRC-03 ... How would you feel if it was proposed that all Advanceds get an instant upgrade to Extra with no additional testing? I'd oppose it ... there's a point to the additional written test for Extra, and without having passed it, you're not qualified. (Before you take another tack here, there IS no point to Morse testing ... so it doesn't really count as a qualification, Element 1 is a vestigial thing that the FCC had to keep in order to not be in derrogation of the ITU Radio Regs, not because it was a truly rational, justifiable "qualification" ...) Main point is that between those two constrainsts, very little change in the writtens or basic structure is possible. And I think the three classes of license are reasonable and appropriate. Tech becomes the "entry" license, general is "mid-grade," and extra is "top." I don't see anything wrong with that ... That's essentially what we have now. If it a'int broke, don't fix it ... the only thing that's "broke" is that they haven't yet eliminated the Morse test now that they're free to do so. 73, Carl - wk3c |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Change of frequency of EM signal | Antenna | |||
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source | Antenna |