Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article k.net, "Bill
Sohl" writes: "N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , The evidence of the survey is clear. You can "stick head and eyes in the sand" but it is still there. Again, what is the date of that survey? Bill, it doesn't really matter...:-) Once a "survey" was done, it is FIXED for all time as indicating "what hams do" years and years after... :-) Case in point: FCC 98-143 was the NPRM for restructuring, was issued 5 years ago. The R&O giving the restructuring changes (99-412) was issued late in 1999. Anyone can go to the FCC ECFS and get any of the Comments on the record, they are still available, all 2,760 of them. The latest Comment, from a 1x3 who puts "PhD" after his name, bitched about the 5 WPM morse top rate, was filed in September 2003! Five years later a few folks haven't gotten the news... :-) [in 2001 the FCC issued 01-108 to deny at least 5 petitions to bring back high-rate morse testing, two years before the "PhD" decided to complain. Gotta love all these aware and informed morsemen! :-)] LHA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Pixie 2 freq change question | Homebrew | |||
Change of frequency of EM signal | Antenna | |||
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source | Antenna |