Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ryan, KC8PMX" wrote in message ...
Fortunately Charter around here is somewhat ameanable (sp.?) to repairing their systems, but it is a challenge still. Consumers Energy around here is next to impossible to deal with though. As Carl points out, burying the distribution doesn't solve the BPL problem. The whole idea is to deliver the BPL signal to every outlet in your house - and your garage, and your neighbors' houses, and the street lights... I am still a strong proponent to buried power lines as opposed to powerlines on poles. There are pros and cons to aerial vs. underground utilities. Except in dense areas like the downtowns of cities where the cost of duct lines is comparable to that of poles, the installation cost of aerial is much lower. Although immune to most weather problems, buried utilities are subject to flooding. They are also not immune to lightning. Buried electric power distribution is less efficient than aerial. This effect increases with voltage and distance, too. Burying the drop from the road to your house isn't an efficiency problem, but burying miles of medium and high voltage stuff *is*. The net effect of burying a significant part of the aerial network would be to require the construction of many new generating facilities (and their pollution, etc.) to make up for the losses of the underground network. A real triple whammy - higher first cost of the line, lots of new plants to build and pay for, and higher overall operating cost. And buried lines make our antennas stick out that much more ;-) 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Miami area Ham or Radio Tech/Engineer? | Homebrew | |||
for amateurs evacuating the brevard county area... | General | |||
BPL a reality in my area now! | Antenna | |||
Effective area question | Antenna | |||
Parts source in Los Angeles area | Homebrew |