Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even if the area distribution lines are buried, the wires come up
to (usually pad-mounted above ground) transformers and the BPL signal will permeate all the wiring in your (and your neighbors') house(s) ... Underground distribution will help (some) but it doesn't actually solve the problem. Right now, the emissions I heard in the trial areas were weaker in areas of underground distribution. However, the losses are higher, so the utility would have to install its digital repeaters more often along the underground lines. It is a safe assumption that the industry that is asking the FCC for higher emissions limits will increase the power so that underground wiring is at those limits, too. We need to stay focused on what the rules would permit -- 30 uV/m at 30 m -- rather than individual implementations that may be below the limits in some cases. Right now, the companies are probably using "stock" equipment for these marketing trials. When it goes live, you can bet they will develop higher powered systems as the most economical way to deploy in underground-wiring areas. 73, Ed Hare, W1RFI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Miami area Ham or Radio Tech/Engineer? | Homebrew | |||
for amateurs evacuating the brevard county area... | General | |||
BPL a reality in my area now! | Antenna | |||
Effective area question | Antenna | |||
Parts source in Los Angeles area | Homebrew |