Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Oct 2003 03:45:31 GMT, Dick Carroll wrote:
What's wrong with going after those engineers who are obscuring the technical facts of BPL? You seem to be missing an essential point: the "client" of an engineer is the employer. If the employer does not complain of unprofessional conduct, there's no case. Similarly, the licensing boards take action only if there is a complaint of unprofessional conduct from one with standing, namely the employer. The one exception is if the engineer violates a criminal statute and the complaint is brought by the District Attorney. If a doctor or lawyer messes up bigtime and people suffer for it, he can be called to account. Only on complaint by someone having standing - the client. No complaint, no case. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Registered Professional Engineer |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Miami area Ham or Radio Tech/Engineer? | Homebrew | |||
for amateurs evacuating the brevard county area... | General | |||
BPL a reality in my area now! | Antenna | |||
Effective area question | Antenna | |||
Parts source in Los Angeles area | Homebrew |