Jack wrote in
:

On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 15:16:25 -0500, "Clint" rattlehead at computron
dot net wrote:



"Richard Cranium" wrote in message
.com...

That's an adverb, not an adjective.

Um, no; it is modifying "brilliant", which is a noun. Thus it is an
adjective.

geez, does it really matter? It's the same word... if the FCC is going
to stoop to THAT low of a level to let certain words "slide" now, why
not just do away with all censoring all at once?

it'll degenerate one day to the type of television they have in europe
and australia, where I hear just about anything goes.

Clint

As compared to where else? For the most part, European TV is vastly
superior in quality to US television. When it comes to childrens
programming, I've discovered that Australia and New Zealand have
produced some of the best and most imaginative kids TV series I've
seen.

In the US, the trash and even worse is there and quite visible. They
just use verbal and visual euphanisms, which is even more
objectionable.

-Jack-




The question is, does this now mean we can say the F word on ham radio?

Alun Palmer wrote:

The question is, does this now mean we can say the F word on ham radio?


No f*cking way I'm going to say the f*cking f-word on f*cking ham radio!

:-)

Since the FCC is the governing authority, yes you can. Not recommended
though. Just because a government agency says its OK doesn't make it right.



"Alun Palmer" wrote in message
...
Jack wrote in
:




The question is, does this now mean we can say the F word on ham radio?

In article l1Hkb.594208$Oz4.583860@rwcrnsc54, "CW"
writes:

Since the FCC is the governing authority, yes you can.

Actually, the fact that FCC says something is OK for broadcasting doesn't mean
they say it's OK for amateur radio. Because the two are different services, FCC
can have different rules of what they allow.

Not recommended
though. Just because a government agency says its OK doesn't make it right.

Agreed!

"Alun Palmer" wrote in message
.. .
Jack wrote in
:

The question is, does this now mean we can say the F word on ham radio?

I wouldn't.

One argument FCC can use to defend the "different rules" thing is that
broadcasting works to a published schedule and the shows are rated in advance.
If you tune in Howard Stern on the radio or the Victoria's Secret Xmas special
on TV, you have a pretty good idea of what you'll hear/see. But on ham radio
there's no schedule, no program guide and no advance ratings.

73 de Jim, N2EY

N2EY wrote:


One argument FCC can use to defend the "different rules" thing is that
broadcasting works to a published schedule and the shows are rated in advance.
If you tune in Howard Stern on the radio or the Victoria's Secret Xmas special
on TV, you have a pretty good idea of what you'll hear/see. But on ham radio
there's no schedule, no program guide and no advance ratings.


Used to be, if you were in LA and tuned in 147.435, one could expect to
hear similar
material. Not that I agree with the existence of such on a ham band,
but it was there.

Robert Casey wrote in message ...
N2EY wrote:

One argument FCC can use to defend the "different rules" thing is that
broadcasting works to a published schedule and the shows are rated in advance.
If you tune in Howard Stern on the radio or the Victoria's Secret Xmas special
on TV, you have a pretty good idea of what you'll hear/see. But on ham radio
there's no schedule, no program guide and no advance ratings.

Used to be, if you were in LA and tuned in 147.435, one could expect to
hear similar
material. Not that I agree with the existence of such on a ham band,
but it was there.

But was it on a published schedule?

Some may consider it a double standard, but the fact is that FCC can
and does have different standards for different services. At least
part of this is due to the ability of broadcasters to spend millions
fighting lawsuits. But the prime argument is the 'complaint rate': If
Mr. Stern says something that causes, say, 400 people to complain to
the FCC, Infinity Broadcasting can say to FCC: "40 million (or
whatever) people listen to Howard and only 400 complained? That's 1 in
100,000 listeners!" What amateur who does the same sort of thing on
the air can make that sort of claim and back it up with real numbers?

73 de Jim, N2EY