Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"N2EY" wrote
So you're just asking me to shut up. Is that what we have to look for in the amateur radio of the 21st century? I've never asked you to shut up. But I have repeatedly informed you that you resemble a stray dog with three legs and one blind eye dragging around a 15-days-dead roadkilled stray cat and acting as if you've uncovered something dangerous. If you guys have an answer that simply quashes the KL7CC paper's bad ideas, why are you so afraid? I'm not a bit afraid. Here's my answer which "simply quashes" your pizza-shaped kitty. If you have tendency to forgetfullness, simply bookmark http://home.earthlink.net/~k0hb and click on the left hand menu item labeled "FCC Comments". II Proposal: I propose that no new applicants be accepted for the current license classes and that after some reasonable grace period, no upgrades be available in the current licensing structure. A. New License Classes: I propose that new license applications be available in two classes, namely "Class B" and "Class A". The "Class B" license would have an entry-level test (basic regulations, safety, operating procedures, basic DC and AC electronics). This class would have full frequency and mode privileges, power limited to 50W output. The license would be issued for a period of 10 years, and be non-renewable. holders of this license would be required to have 2 years experience as a licensee ("time in grade") before being eligible to upgrade to "Class A". The "Class A" license test would be of a difficulty level similar to the current Extra class test, and would have full privileges at power levels up to 1500W, equivalent to current Extra Class license holders. This license would be issued permanently without requirement for renewal. B. Status of current licensees. Current licenses could be renewed indefinitely, and would retain their current operating privileges. Current Novice, Technician, General, and Advanced class licensees could up grade to "Class A" at any time. You didn't ask Hans to shut up with his 2 license class proposal. Are you asking me to shut up with my 2 license class proposal, Jim? 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "They called me mad, and I called them mad, but damn them, they outvoted me." |
#82
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KØHB wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote To which I would ask Carl and Hans: Do you really think people are so stupid that they won't think of something unless Jim Miccollis says it? No, I don't think there's anyone here that stupid. But then again I didn't think there was anyone here stupid enough to ask such a stupid question, and you've just proved me wrong. If pleasantness is inversely related to intelligence, you kind sir, are a genius. And this stupid person believes you are a genius. Quite frankly, you are as pleasant as Lenover21. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#83
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#84
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes: "Mike Coslo" wrote in message t... N2EY wrote: In article , "Carl R. Stevenson" writes: "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... N2EY wrote: In article .net, "KØHB" writes: (I know he's playing devil's advocate, but something that's repeated often enough sometimes catches on and I don't want to see Jim end up being the best salesman for something that I know he doesn't want to see any more than I do ...) So you're just asking me to shut up. Is that what we have to look for in the amateur radio of the 21st century? That is how I read it also. You (we) are being told to just keep quiet, and that if we say anything, it will be our fault if the things we are warning about come to pass. Yep. That's exactly the way I read, you (Mike) read it, and you (Jim) read it. Probably more than just us. BUT, are we surprised? That is status quo in at least this group of people--i.e. rather common practice in this newsgroup to desire that someone "shut up" if that opinion is coming from an opposite or challenging side. I don't think I've ever told anyone here to shut up. But I have seen others do it. For example: From: (Len Over 21) Date: 28 Oct 2003 04:35:14 GMT (in response to K8MN): "Shut the hell up, you little USMC feldwebel. Learn to READ English." Just the kind we want for newcomers, huh? New standards of civil debate. To which I would ask Carl and Hans: Do you really think people are so stupid that they won't think of something unless Jim Miccollis says it? (One "L" in the name) That's a good question, but it really isn't the point. *Whether* people "are so stupid that they won't think of something unless Jim Miccollis says it," or not, Jim has--anyone has--the perfect right to say whatever they'd like. Thanks, Kim. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#85
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kim W5TIT" wrote
That's a good question, but it really isn't the point. Actually it wasn't a very good question at all. In fact, I'm not sure it was even a question, but more a feeble attempt to troll, so I checked my Troll-O-Meter, and it didn't even budge up off the pin. Since Mike Coslo is an avid Morse Code operator like me, I expected a much better reading on the meter. Sigh...... truly disappointing. Jim has--anyone has--the perfect right to say whatever they'd like. Bingo! Good answer, Kim! You nailed it dead on! And I have every right to tell Jim that he resembles a flea-bitten stray dog with three legs and one blind eye dragging around a 15-days-dead roadkilled stray cat and growling and posturing and acting as if he has uncovered something dangerous. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#86
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote Well, yes! But it would be yummy fun to hear their answer though. 8^) Well, I gave you my answer. Are you having "yummy fun" now? Golly gee, I certainly hope so! Sunuvagun! 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#87
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Coslo" wrote
If pleasantness is inversely related to intelligence, you kind sir, are a genius. And this stupid person believes you are a genius. Thank you! Why am I reminded of the old saw about "if you can't stand the heat....." My "pleasantness" to you was directly related to your "pleasantness" toward me, but I don't get even, I get ahead. And just what the hell is "yummy fun" anyhow? With kindest personal regards, de Hans, K0HB |
#88
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N2EY wrote:
(One "L" in the name) Oops, Sorry Jim. But what about Jim Miccollis? - Mike KB3EIA - |
#89
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KØHB wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote Well, yes! But it would be yummy fun to hear their answer though. 8^) Well, I gave you my answer. Are you having "yummy fun" now? Golly gee, I certainly hope so! Sunuvagun! Actually, if you think that calling me stupid is an answer, yes indeed Hans, it was indeed yummy fun to hear you answer my question! Do you really think people are so stupid that they won't think of something unless Jim Miccollis (sic) says it? But then again I didn't think there was anyone here stupid enough to ask such a stupid question, and you've just proved me wrong. Good reply! tks OM! - Mike KB3EIA - |
#90
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KØHB wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote If pleasantness is inversely related to intelligence, you kind sir, are a genius. And this stupid person believes you are a genius. Thank you! Why am I reminded of the old saw about "if you can't stand the heat....." huh? My "pleasantness" to you was directly related to your "pleasantness" toward me, but I don't get even, I get ahead. Perhaps I touched a nerve asking the question? mea maxima culpa And just what the hell is "yummy fun" anyhow? Delicious irony. Like you finding it appropriate to call me stupid when I ask a question. That you find it an appropriate answer is the key. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|