Mike Coslo wrote:

JJ wrote:


Suggest you and Kim read this:

http://www.msnbc.com/news/987498.asp?cp1=1


Ancient liberal press trick of assigning reasons for something to
something else.

My read:
1. Earlier, a lot of Black people moved north for jobs.

2. Jobs go away, and next generation is better educated.

3. People move to where they can get a job.


I guess you failed to read this part, or you just ignored it because it
did not fit with what you want to believe.

"That movement north slowed as job opportunities dwindled and *racial
tensions rose* in northern cities in the 1960s and 1970s, Ross said."

JJ wrote:


I guess you failed to read this part, or you just ignored it because it
did not fit with what you want to believe.

"That movement north slowed as job opportunities dwindled and *racial
tensions rose* in northern cities in the 1960s and 1970s, Ross said."

I don't deny they got a few parts right.

Hey, you want a theory?

How about an effort made to get African Americans (traditionally
Democrat)to move back to the south to balance out the political leanings
of the area? We might be able to get some "authority" to say something
like that.

- Mike KB3EIA

"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
t...

Hey, you want a theory?

How about an effort made to get African Americans (traditionally
Democrat)to move back to the south to balance out the political leanings
of the area?

That's a little far-fetched... a conspiracy to get millions to move just for
political reasons?

Would you up and move all the way across the country, family and ALL,
your entire LIFE change drastically, just so a ceratian politician will get
1 more vote?

Clint
KB5ZHT
--

--

45 Communist Goals for America

http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm

--

Clint wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
t...

Hey, you want a theory?

How about an effort made to get African Americans (traditionally
Democrat)to move back to the south to balance out the political leanings
of the area?


That's a little far-fetched... a conspiracy to get millions to move just for
political reasons?

Would you up and move all the way across the country, family and ALL,
your entire LIFE change drastically, just so a ceratian politician will get
1 more vote?

Not if that was the direct approach, but people with agendas tend to
approach things obliquely on occasion.

I recall a few years back when some minorities encouraged lots of
children so as to eventually become much less of a minority. I can think
of some funny names to describe that process! 8^)

Life is so strange.....

- Mike KB3EIA -

What does any of this have to do with BPL?????

Carl - wk3c

"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...
Clint wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
t...

Hey, you want a theory?

How about an effort made to get African Americans (traditionally
Democrat)to move back to the south to balance out the political leanings
of the area?


That's a little far-fetched... a conspiracy to get millions to move just
for
political reasons?

Would you up and move all the way across the country, family and ALL,
your entire LIFE change drastically, just so a ceratian politician will
get
1 more vote?

Not if that was the direct approach, but people with agendas tend to
approach things obliquely on occasion.

I recall a few years back when some minorities encouraged lots of
children so as to eventually become much less of a minority. I can think
of some funny names to describe that process! 8^)

Life is so strange.....

- Mike KB3EIA -

Carl R. Stevenson wrote:

What does any of this have to do with BPL?????

Carl - wk3c

This topic drifted a long time before I ever started posting on it.
It's had a lot of racism accusations, a lot of work ethic comparisons,
and even some thought on how the guv'mint should be run. Probably more
of that than BPL.

Chalk it up to topic drift.

- Mike KB3EIA -

"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
news
Carl R. Stevenson wrote:

What does any of this have to do with BPL?????

Carl - wk3c

This topic drifted a long time before I ever started posting on it.
It's had a lot of racism accusations, a lot of work ethic comparisons,
and even some thought on how the guv'mint should be run. Probably more
of that than BPL.

Chalk it up to topic drift.

- Mike KB3EIA -


Yep, and for me it's been more interesting...

Kim W5TIT

In article , "Carl R. Stevenson"
writes:

What does any of this have to do with BPL?????

Carl, this isn't a newsgroup, it's a CHAT ROOM for the regulars
and their buddies. All can talk on anydamnthingtheywant
because they got licensed as amateurs. One can only talk
about actual amateur radio policy issues someplace else... :-)

LHA

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , "Carl R. Stevenson"
writes:

What does any of this have to do with BPL?????

Carl, this isn't a newsgroup, it's a CHAT ROOM for the regulars
and their buddies.

Nope, not even the use of CAPITAL LETTERS makes this a chat room. It is
still a newsgroup.

All can talk on anydamnthingtheywant
because they got licensed as amateurs.

All can discuss any topic because it isn't outlawed. As you've been
quick to point out, this is an unmoderated group. You've frequently
gone quite far afield in your postings. We'll chalk this up as another
"Do as I say and not as I do" comment.

One can only talk
about actual amateur radio policy issues someplace else... :-)

What's it to you? You aren't ivolved in amateur radio.

Dave K8MN