Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"N2EY" wrote:
Then the contract should be changed because it's not cost-effective in the long run. It often costs more to change a contract than it does to simply live with a minor inefficiency. Nobody is losing that much money. It's just an irratation to constantly buy new fans. I think it's perfectly reasonable to expect them to do so! It's part of life in a modern industrialized society with global trade. I've been going in circles with Kim over this very subject. People (consumers) purchase hundreds of items each year. Products constantly change, meaning ongoing research for each item would be required. Because of that, consumers simply don't have the time or the informational resources to even superficially research each of the items they purchase. I certainly don't do it and I seriously doubt you do either (however, Kim says she does). They don't have to. The govt. requires all sorts of labels on all sorts of items, which means all one needs to know is how to interpret those labels. Outfits like Consumer's Union do product testing so we don't have to. And the 'net gives us access to enormous amounts of information. Do remember we're talking about the economy. Labels are not going to tell us which companies are moving factories overseas, or which are paying their employees decent wages, or which are using illegal immigrants, or which are using materials made overseas, which are using sweatshop labor, or so on. And the internet does give us access to enormous amounts of information - most of it biased, agenda-filled, garbage. Getting accurate and reliable information is the hard part. Government at least tries to offer info about larger corporations, but who offers that info when it comes to the stores, businesses, and factories, in my hometown (or in hometowns around the country)? And it doesn't take a degree in economics to know that if enough people stop going to Ma's Diner and instead patronize Taco Heaven, that Ma's is going to go out of business. Consumers don't act as a single body, Jim. When was the last time you pondered what other consumers are doing when you went to a restaurant? Without doing so, there is no way to know other people have stopped going to Ma's Diner. Instead, you go to Taco Heaven assuming everything is just fine over at Ma's Diner. Other consumers do the same. Most only discover there's a problem at Ma's Diner when they see the going out of business sign. The same pattern plays out in other markets (Wal-Mart versus local stores and so on). Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dwight Stewart wrote:
"N2EY" wrote: Then the contract should be changed because it's not cost-effective in the long run. It often costs more to change a contract than it does to simply live with a minor inefficiency. Nobody is losing that much money. It's just an irratation to constantly buy new fans. If the old one was that great, why isn't it still running? I think it's perfectly reasonable to expect them to do so! It's part of life in a modern industrialized society with global trade. I've been going in circles with Kim over this very subject. People (consumers) purchase hundreds of items each year. Products constantly change, meaning ongoing research for each item would be required. Because of that, consumers simply don't have the time or the informational resources to even superficially research each of the items they purchase. I certainly don't do it and I seriously doubt you do either (however, Kim says she does). It isn't necessary to research each and every item you buy, Dwight. I certainly do research before I make big purchases and I make my decision after weighing a number of factors including quality, where an item is made and how much it costs. With items like TV's and VCR's, I only worry about quality and price. There haven't been any of those devices made in this country in years. Take amateur radio gear as an example. Did you buy the "plastic fan" of amateur radio equipment? Was it made in the U.S.? I run Ten-Tec gear despite price. I get a superior performance from a transceiver made in the U.S. I could have gotten a cheaper radio made in Japan. And it doesn't take a degree in economics to know that if enough people stop going to Ma's Diner and instead patronize Taco Heaven, that Ma's is going to go out of business. Consumers don't act as a single body, Jim. When was the last time you pondered what other consumers are doing when you went to a restaurant? Without doing so, there is no way to know other people have stopped going to Ma's Diner. Instead, you go to Taco Heaven assuming everything is just fine over at Ma's Diner. Other consumers do the same. Most only discover there's a problem at Ma's Diner when they see the going out of business sign. The same pattern plays out in other markets (Wal-Mart versus local stores and so on). Then no one who isn't eating at Ma's should wring his hands when it closes if they've spent their money Taco Heaven. I buy major appliances from a local fellow. Part of it is good will. Part of it pure selfishness on my part. When something breaks, the local fellow comes right out to make repairs. I don't have to schedule a visit by a fellow 40 miles away. I just bought a quarter of beef. The steer was standing out in a field a few days ago. I paid $2.00/lb and the only middle man is the fellow who cut, wrapped and froze it. By the way, we've noticed no BPL rollout here in West, by God, Virginia. Dave K8MN |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Heil" wrote:
Dwight Stewart wrote: It often costs more to change a contract than it does to simply live with a minor inefficiency. Nobody is losing that much money. It's just an irratation to constantly buy new fans. If the old one was that great, why isn't it still running? You obviously missed some of the conversation, Dave. I was complaining about the quality of plastic fans today and how I couldn't find better ones locally. When Jim asked why I bought fans locally (instead of shopping on the internet), I explained the fans were purchased under the terms of a business contract. Jim suggested the contract should be changed. And this is about where you came in to read my reply above. It isn't necessary to research each and every item you buy, Dwight. (snip) Actually, I was trying to make the point that we wouldn't have to so diligently research products if government and business was held to a higher standard when it comes to the economy. I've posted more details about that in other messages, so I won't repeat it again here. By the way, we've noticed no BPL rollout here in West, by God, Virginia. Yep, this thread has covered just about everything except that recently, hasn't it? As you know, it's pretty much the nature of these newsgroups to stray off into other topics in any given thread. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
nk.net... "Dave Heil" wrote: It isn't necessary to research each and every item you buy, Dwight. (snip) Actually, I was trying to make the point that we wouldn't have to so diligently research products if government and business was held to a higher standard when it comes to the economy. I've posted more details about that in other messages, so I won't repeat it again here. But, you've already stated, Dwight, that people [paraphrasing] are too stupid and don't have the time to research their shopping products. So, how in the world are they going to be smart enough to choose the right people for government to "a-d-v-i-s-e" the public on what they should be shopping for? Hell, the government *and* business--the corporate world--are two of the most corrupt entities!! You apparently haven't been paying a bit of attention for the last couple of years. You want to throw out these wild statements and then you follow up with some kind of clue that you don't have one (a clue). Kim W5TIT |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kim W5TIT" wrote:
But, you've already stated, Dwight, that people [paraphrasing] are too stupid and don't have the time to research their shopping products. (snip) No, Kim, you're not paraphrasing - you're flat out lying. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew | |||
FS Large LOT Of NEW Tubes | Boatanchors | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew | |||
FS Large Lot of NEW NOS Tubes | Homebrew |