LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old October 28th 03, 10:19 PM
Robert Casey
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Why should the ARRL pretend to represent the CB Radio Service? It was
established to represent the Amateur operators long before CB ever
came into being. Who would want to represent the sewer pit of
communication that CB has become? Why would they want to represent a
bunch of idiots who haven't a clue as how to properly use radio
communication, that operate in a number of illegal ways and cause
general havoc on the radio spectrum. The ARRL should not touch CB with
a 10 foot pole.


I wouldn't touch it with an 11 meter pole. :-)


Morse code was never, ever required in USA CB...and CB
does exist IN the HF spectrum


CB is not amateur, and one of the rules of the CB service is no
international comms.
Not that it's enforced......

"you don't know **** from Shinola".


Well, you can't polish a turd...... ;-)





 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access Lloyd Mitchell Antenna 43 October 26th 04 01:37 AM
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions Louis C. LeVine General 8 September 8th 04 12:14 PM
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC John Walton Homebrew 0 July 2nd 04 12:26 PM
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota Chuck Gysi N2DUP General 0 May 9th 04 09:18 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1382 – February 6, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 February 6th 04 09:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017