Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "Bert Craig"
writes: "Rupert" wrote in message link.net... Len Over 21 wrote: As of 6 PM EST on 11 November 2003, the number of ECFS documents on public view a What would be interesting is to find out how many are for the change, and how many want to keep the code. Me too. All this roundabout bravo sierra could be bypassed if there was a ballot sent to all approx. 700,000 U.S. licensed hams. As long as quorum is met, it's on! This concept (Democracy) frightens the bejesus out of many folks who claim to speak for those not yet licensed. But that's an empty argument. Get licensed and vote, tah dah! The big bad "barrier" does not preclude anyone from getting their no-code Tech ticket and executing a vote. Egbert, according to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, there's NO "license membership requirement" to petition our government for the redress of grievances. None at all. You seem to be confusing the FCC with the ARRL. Try to separate church from state. Good luck on becoming unconfused. LHA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Len Over 21 wrote:
Egbert, according to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, there's NO "license membership requirement" to petition our government for the redress of grievances. None at all. From which particular grievance are you seeking redress, Leonard? Dave K8MN |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |