| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message y.com... "Phil Kane" wrote in message .net... On 16 Nov 2003 01:28:42 GMT, N2EY wrote: Me too. All this roundabout bravo sierra could be bypassed if there was a ballot sent to all approx. 700,000 U.S. licensed hams. Suppose someone did, indeed, poll everyone with a US ham license. First question: who is going to front the six figures required to send out the ballots even by bulk mail? The FCC? No way - contrary to urban legend, for the last 10 years or so, all government agencies pay full postage rates on everything they mail - except for Congressional mailings, of course. "What is your opinion of code testing for an amateur license?" 1) It should be totally abolished 2) It should be required only for Extra 3) It should be required only for Extra and General 4) It should be required for any license with HF privileges 5) It should be required for any amateur license 6) No opinion/don't care Or you might find that the majority opinion was 6). What happens in that case? Or it's a tie between #6 and no response ??? -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane No response would probably be the commonest item even if the ballots come with return postage paid by the government. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Bottom line, who cares since the entire concept is a joke anyway and stands NO chance of ever happening. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
| Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx | |||