| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
November 22nd 03, 03:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Alun wrote:
(N2EY) wrote in news:20031121082829.07578.00001764@mb- m25.aol.com: In article , Alun writes: However, my point is just that polling only licenced hams is just not appropriate, as hams are not the only interested parties. Who are the non-hams who are interested in the code test issue? 73 de Jim, N2EY Anyone who has been thinking of becoming a ham, I would imagine Maybe a fellow like Leonard H. Anderson! He's been mulling it over for decades. Dave K8MN |
|
#2
November 22nd 03, 04:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Heil wrote in
: Alun wrote: (N2EY) wrote in news:20031121082829.07578.00001764@mb- m25.aol.com: In article , Alun writes: However, my point is just that polling only licenced hams is just not appropriate, as hams are not the only interested parties. Who are the non-hams who are interested in the code test issue? 73 de Jim, N2EY Anyone who has been thinking of becoming a ham, I would imagine Maybe a fellow like Leonard H. Anderson! He's been mulling it over for decades. Dave K8MN Sure, why not? I think the FCC should even take his point of view into account. |
|
#3
November 22nd 03, 05:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alun wrote:
Dave Heil wrote in : Alun wrote: (N2EY) wrote in news:20031121082829.07578.00001764@mb- m25.aol.com: In article , Alun writes: However, my point is just that polling only licenced hams is just not appropriate, as hams are not the only interested parties. Who are the non-hams who are interested in the code test issue? 73 de Jim, N2EY Anyone who has been thinking of becoming a ham, I would imagine Maybe a fellow like Leonard H. Anderson! He's been mulling it over for decades. Sure, why not? I think the FCC should even take his point of view into account. The Commission is forced by law to accept his input. Nothing forces the FCC to act on it. Dave K8MN |
|
#4
November 22nd 03, 05:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Alun wrote in message . ..
Dave Heil wrote in : Alun wrote: (N2EY) wrote in news:20031121082829.07578.00001764@mb- m25.aol.com: In article , Alun writes: However, my point is just that polling only licenced hams is just not appropriate, as hams are not the only interested parties. Who are the non-hams who are interested in the code test issue? 73 de Jim, N2EY Anyone who has been thinking of becoming a ham, I would imagine Maybe a fellow like Leonard H. Anderson! He's been mulling it over for decades. Dave K8MN Sure, why not? I think the FCC should even take his point of view into account. Some of us are even counting on it. ;-) 73 de Bert WA2SI |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
| Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx | |||
Hybrid Mode
