Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"N2EY" wrote:
(snip) What we're saying is that on the single issue of continued Morse code testing, (snip) (snip) Not me. I EARNED mine. I encourage others to EARN theirs. Is that bad? Shall I apologize for my accomplishments and sit idly by while others try to trash a community I belong to? If what you're demanding to "earn" that license is unnecessary and based on a false premise, then I think it is bad. You haven't established, at least not to my satisfaction (nor the satisfaction of the ITU, FCC, and several countries around the world), why Morse code is necessary (notice I said necessary, not enjoyable) for ham radio today. And there is no truth whatsoever to the premise that those without code skills in the ham radio community are trashing anything. Instead, the vast majority are dedicated, well-behaved, enthusiastic, participants of this community. Several countries around the world have moved, or are moving, forward to eliminate the Morse Code testing requirement while the United States sits back and watches. Is this the actions of a modern, progressive, country with feet planted firmly on today and eyes on the future? It's time to move on, Jim. Morse code is going to be even less necessary in the future. As such, Morse Code testing has no ligitimate place in that future. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |