Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KØHB" wrote in message hlink.net... "N2EY" wrote In fact, except for the most basic of rules and regulations, your argument leads to the inescapable conclusion that it is not necessary for the goals and purposes of the Amateur Radio Service at this point to mandate *any* learning through a testing requirement. Jim, If you want people to quit making fun of you, quit posting such laughable reductio ad absurdum arguments. 73, de Hans, K0HB Given some of the things I've read on the internet I'm not so sure that it is a reductio ad absurdum argument. We may actually be heading inexorably in that direction. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |