Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 28th 03, 02:07 PM
Kim W5TIT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
link.net...
"Steve Robeson, K4CAP" wrote:

As you are well aware, part of the FCC's
Basis and Purpose of the Amateur Radio Service
is an expectation of technical learning. (snip)



Learning is part of the basis and purpose of the Amateur Radio Service,
not the basis and purpose of the license exams. The basis and purpose of

the
license exams is to make possible the basis and purpose of the Amateur

Radio
Service. In other words, to bring people into the Amateur Radio Service so
they can learn. The real learning comes after the exams in what we

actually
do.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/


Wow. Good point, Dwight. Maybe that idea of a term limitation license
makes more sense than ever. I haven't been in favor of it...but maybe
there's a part of it I haven't thought of, such as your comment above.

Kim W5TIT


  #2   Report Post  
Old November 28th 03, 11:37 PM
Brian
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Kim W5TIT" wrote in message ...
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
link.net...
"Steve Robeson, K4CAP" wrote:

As you are well aware, part of the FCC's
Basis and Purpose of the Amateur Radio Service
is an expectation of technical learning. (snip)


Learning is part of the basis and purpose of the Amateur Radio Service,
not the basis and purpose of the license exams. The basis and purpose of

the
license exams is to make possible the basis and purpose of the Amateur

Radio
Service. In other words, to bring people into the Amateur Radio Service so
they can learn. The real learning comes after the exams in what we

actually
do.

Dwight Stewart (W5NET)


Wow. Good point, Dwight. Maybe that idea of a term limitation license
makes more sense than ever. I haven't been in favor of it...but maybe
there's a part of it I haven't thought of, such as your comment above.

Kim W5TIT


This is where some of the OF's say that all learning must occur prior
to the exam. Basically, nothing more can be learned after the Extra
exam. Except when they "earned" thir commercial licenses. Except
when Len brings up his commercial experience.

See what I mean?

I'm not buying it - never have.
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 29th 03, 01:07 AM
Dwight Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Kim W5TIT" wrote:

Wow. Good point, Dwight. Maybe that
idea of a term limitation license makes more
sense than ever. I haven't been in favor of
it...but maybe there's a part of it I haven't
thought of, such as your comment above.



Learning is one aspect of the basis and purpose of the Amateur Radio
Service, not the total sum. When discussing term limits on license class,
all aspects of that should be considered. And, when it comes to those other
aspects, there is no real benefit from term limits. Indeed, one could argue
that it may actually harm those other things (reducing our overall numbers,
for example).


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

  #4   Report Post  
Old November 29th 03, 03:40 PM
Kim W5TIT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
news
"Kim W5TIT" wrote:

Wow. Good point, Dwight. Maybe that
idea of a term limitation license makes more
sense than ever. I haven't been in favor of
it...but maybe there's a part of it I haven't
thought of, such as your comment above.



Learning is one aspect of the basis and purpose of the Amateur Radio
Service, not the total sum. When discussing term limits on license class,
all aspects of that should be considered. And, when it comes to those

other
aspects, there is no real benefit from term limits. Indeed, one could

argue
that it may actually harm those other things (reducing our overall

numbers,
for example).


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/


Well, what I would support would be something like a pretty simple test--I
mean darned simple--with a minimal operating privilege built in with it. At
the end of something like a year or 2 years, then one would either have to
upgrade with a more technical and knowledge-based test and a higher,
permanent license class. I still would leave CW out of the mix, too...

However, I don't think there's going to be any major changes to the
licensing or testing structure for another couple of years. Jim, I think it
was, had a thread going with the predictions of when CW would be taken out
and I think I had a couple of years while others were guessing pretty quick.
I think CW testing is here to stay for a while.

Kim W5TIT


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The 14 Petitions Len Over 21 Policy 3 November 10th 03 12:31 AM
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing Len Over 21 Policy 0 October 22nd 03 11:38 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews Policy 0 September 20th 03 04:13 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews General 0 September 20th 03 04:12 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 20th 03 04:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017