Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 28th 03, 11:48 PM
Dwight Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dee D. Flint" wrote:

My response was to your statement that
code itself was unnecessary and I made
that clear that I was addressing that issue
only. (snip)



But my entire message, including the argument in that sentence, was about
the code test. However, within that context, it is indeed true that Morse
code is not "necessary" for Amateur Radio today. The key word is
"necessary," not enjoyable, not great recreation, not useful to make
contacts with friends when conditions are bad, or whatever. Necessary. And,
therefore, if Morse code is not uniquely necessary, it should join the other
modes on the written tests without a unique testing requirement.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The 14 Petitions Len Over 21 Policy 3 November 10th 03 12:31 AM
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing Len Over 21 Policy 0 October 22nd 03 11:38 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews Policy 0 September 20th 03 04:13 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews General 0 September 20th 03 04:12 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 20th 03 04:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017