Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dee D. Flint" wrote:
My response was to your statement that code itself was unnecessary and I made that clear that I was addressing that issue only. (snip) But my entire message, including the argument in that sentence, was about the code test. However, within that context, it is indeed true that Morse code is not "necessary" for Amateur Radio today. The key word is "necessary," not enjoyable, not great recreation, not useful to make contacts with friends when conditions are bad, or whatever. Necessary. And, therefore, if Morse code is not uniquely necessary, it should join the other modes on the written tests without a unique testing requirement. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx |