| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message gy.com... "KØHB" wrote in message link.net... "Dee D. Flint" wrote And it has the unique characteristic that you can't take advantage of it until you have acquired a basic skill level. Unique? What's unique about Morse in that regard. There is no mode which you can use without some basic skill level in that mode. 73, Hans, K0HB None of the other modes requires any skill at all beyond connecting the pieces per the diagrams and typing on the keyboard or pushing a mike button. Although typing is a skill, it is not radio specific and the hunt & peck typist gets by. Virtually anyone can put set up & run in an afternoon once they have acquired the equipment. One can also use morse code with a "decoding" sheet to send and recieve at very slow speeds, The skill requirement to operate other modes is insignificant. The same can be said for morse...unless you want to operate at other than a basic level. For some reason, this discussion always seems to presume one must be code literate at speeds well above even 5 wpm for code to be useful to anyone. If one can "hunt & peck" via a keyboard, the same can be done for morse using a "cheat sheet" to send and receive morse at slow speeds. I've operated both RTTY and packet and other digital modes and found them totally boring but I have had experience with them and there simply is no specific skill required. Even "hunt & peck" requires an ability to use the keyboard at a very minimal level. You may not think that it is any skill level at all, but it is. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bill Sohl" wrote in message hlink.net... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message gy.com... [snip] The same can be said for morse...unless you want to operate at other than a basic level. For some reason, this discussion always seems to presume one must be code literate at speeds well above even 5 wpm for code to be useful to anyone. If one can "hunt & peck" via a keyboard, the same can be done for morse using a "cheat sheet" to send and receive morse at slow speeds. No 5wpm is useful just a tedious for the listener. Learning it to a higher speed simply makes it easier to communicate and increases the probability that the person will not forget his/her code over time. However, using a "cheat sheet" won't even let you go 5wpm as it takes too long to look up the letters. I've operated both RTTY and packet and other digital modes and found them totally boring but I have had experience with them and there simply is no specific skill required. Even "hunt & peck" requires an ability to use the keyboard at a very minimal level. You may not think that it is any skill level at all, but it is. In today's world, most people have to learn that skill at a minimmal anyway whether or not they wish to be radio Amateurs so do not include that as something unique to Amateur Radio. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message gy.com... "Bill Sohl" wrote in message hlink.net... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message gy.com... [snip] The same can be said for morse...unless you want to operate at other than a basic level. For some reason, this discussion always seems to presume one must be code literate at speeds well above even 5 wpm for code to be useful to anyone. If one can "hunt & peck" via a keyboard, the same can be done for morse using a "cheat sheet" to send and receive morse at slow speeds. No 5wpm is useful just a tedious for the listener. Learning it to a higher speed simply makes it easier to communicate and increases the probability that the person will not forget his/her code over time. However, using a "cheat sheet" won't even let you go 5wpm as it takes too long to look up the letters. So what? The point is that anyone could use a cheat sheet to send and recieve morse. I never claimed it could be done at 5wpm. In reality, there is NO minimum code speed required for on-the-air use of the mode. The test requirement is only that...a test requirement. If two non-code hams decide to QSO on 2 meter simplex sometime, there is NO FCC rule requiring any specific minimum sending speed be used. I've operated both RTTY and packet and other digital modes and found them totally boring but I have had experience with them and there simply is no specific skill required. Even "hunt & peck" requires an ability to use the keyboard at a very minimal level. You may not think that it is any skill level at all, but it is. In today's world, most people have to learn that skill at a minimmal anyway whether or not they wish to be radio Amateurs so do not include that as something unique to Amateur Radio. And the converse is true for morse. There is no longer any international treaty requirement and the FCC has already stated they see no rational for code testing to be retained. Ergo... no need for specific amateur testing of morse for HF licensning...IMHO Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
| Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx | |||