| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
k.net... As I see it, this is an amateur activity designed with three basic goals in mind - provide some radio services to others (public service), some benefit to the participants (recreational radio activities), and a mild introduction to the field of electronics. That may well be as *you* see it, but according to their rules going back at least 50 years, FCC goals aren't about "a mild introduction" to electronics. From 1950's Part 12, paragraph 12.0(d) "Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of ...... ELECTRONICS EXPERTS". From the contemporary Part 97, paragraph 97.1(d) "Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of ...... ELECTRONICS EXPERTS". Some seem to suggest we add content to more closely fit a college degree program. I haven't seen any such suggestion here (or anywhere else). My proposal suggests that the standard full-privilege qualifications should be essentially equivalent to the current Amateur Extra written examination. Since there are numerous examples of pre-teen children who have met that level of qualification, it certainly doesn't rise to the level of a "college degree program". 73, de Hans, K0HB |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
| Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx | |||