| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KØHB" wrote:
That may well be as *you* see it, but according to their rules going back at least 50 years, FCC goals aren't about "a mild introduction" to electronics. From 1950's Part 12, paragraph 12.0 (d) "Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of ...... ELECTRONICS EXPERTS". From the contemporary Part 97, paragraph 97.1(d) "Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of ...... ELECTRONICS EXPERTS". Nice editing to fit an agenda, Hans. However, the actual wording of 97.1(d) talks about expanding the existing reservoir of "trained operators, technicians, and electronics experts," not just "electronics experts." The FCC never intended for this radio service to be made up of electronics experts, or for all operators to become electronics experts. Thanks to the introduction to electronics Amateur Radio offers, some will become interested enough to seek outside education in some field of electronics - the real experts. Most will never be interested enough to go that far (home-brewing or lesser electronics jobs). And perhaps the vast majority will happily go through life as trained operators. Whatever the case, the goals of 97.1(d) are fulfilled. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The 14 Petitions | Policy | |||
| Responses to 14 Petitions on Code Testing | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1362– September 19 2003 | Dx | |||